NY1: Failure to controvert any facts or make an argument justifies denying suppression hearing

“Although the felony complaint, indictment, voluntary disclosure form, arraignment transcript, and search warrant affidavit disclosed to defendant provided him with ‘detailed information about the sequence of events leading up to his arrest’ …, he failed to controvert the specific information provided by the People or to establish any other basis for suppression.” People v. Kayumov, 2024 NY Slip Op 05415, 2024 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5670 (1st Dept. Oct. 31, 2024).*

Even though the arrest was outside the house, the protective sweep doctrine guards against risks from those unseen and even inside. Moore v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197533 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2024).

Reasonable suspicion isn’t required for a police database records check. Toyer v. United States, 2024 D.C. App. LEXIS 394 (Oct. 31, 2024).*

There was nexus and probable cause for the search warrant for defendant’s cell phone. Also, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Lopez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197654 (D. Minn. Oct. 31, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.