Daily Archives: January 24, 2026

E.D.Pa.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to grand jury evidence

Under Calandra (1974), there’s no basis for dismissing an indictment because it might be based on an illegal search. The search was valid anyway because it was based on the consenter’s apparent authority. United States v. Jones, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Immigration arrests, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to grand jury evidence

SC: DNA taken on 2007 arrest didn’t need to be suppressed because he was acquitted back then

Defendant’s DNA was taken when he was charged in 2007 and later acquitted. The DNA sample should not be suppressed because it was lawfully taken at the time. State v. Harrington, 2026 S.C. App. LEXIS 7 (Jan. 21, 2026). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on SC: DNA taken on 2007 arrest didn’t need to be suppressed because he was acquitted back then

WaPo: As ICE arrests surged, Trump administration sought to cut bodycam program

WaPo: As ICE arrests surged, Trump administration sought to cut bodycam program by Maria Sacchetti (“A string of violent incidents has added fresh urgency to calls for more body-worn cameras. But DHS proposed reducing spending on them in its initial … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on WaPo: As ICE arrests surged, Trump administration sought to cut bodycam program