Author Archives: Hall

TN: 2009 DNA seizure that should have been purged and wasn’t could be relied on in GF and then another order issued

Defendant’s DNA was seized in 2009 and should have been purged, but it wasn’t. He’s later charged with another crime. A confirmatory test was run. The good faith exception applies to the DNA that wasn’t purged like it was supposed … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: 2009 DNA seizure that should have been purged and wasn’t could be relied on in GF and then another order issued

WI: “the end of a romantic relationship does not automatically terminate shared authority when the partner continues to access or use the property”

“The fact that Klein expressed anger toward A.V. and moved some of her belongings outside does not establish that her residential status had ended. He did not finish removing her possessions, he permitted her inside, and her household items remained … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on WI: “the end of a romantic relationship does not automatically terminate shared authority when the partner continues to access or use the property”

WaPo: A school locked down after AI flagged a gun. It was a clarinet.

WaPo: A school locked down after AI flagged a gun. It was a clarinet. (“A growing number of schools across the country use AI-powered surveillance to detect guns and contraband, all in the name of making schools safer.”)

Posted in AI | Comments Off on WaPo: A school locked down after AI flagged a gun. It was a clarinet.

W.D.Wash.: Touching outside keypad doesn’t require announcement

The officer’s touching a house outside keypad to illuminate it didn’t require an announcement before that. They had the code and were coming in, and they did announce. United States v. Broady, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 262077 (W.D. Wash. Dec. … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Touching outside keypad doesn’t require announcement

Reason: Governments Are Pushing Digital IDs. Are You Ready To Be Tracked?

Reason: Governments Are Pushing Digital IDs. Are You Ready To Be Tracked? by John Stossell (“Politicians push government IDs. In a TSA announcement, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem sternly warns, ‘You will need a REAL ID to travel by … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reason: Governments Are Pushing Digital IDs. Are You Ready To Be Tracked?

D.D.C.: Arrest on a warrant where defendant fled justified search incident

Defendant had a warrant for his arrest. He was seen by police, and he fled. When he was tackled to the ground and handcuffed, the officers rolled him over finding a gun in his waistband. It was a valid search … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Arrest on a warrant where defendant fled justified search incident

CA11: Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements don’t violate 4A

The reporting requirements of the Corporate Transparency Act don’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Nat’l Small Bus. United v. United States Dep’t of the Treasury, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32844 (11th Cir. Dec. 16, 2025):

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA11: Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements don’t violate 4A

E.D.Pa.: Cell phone can’t be seized on RS and exigency then wait four days to get a SW

“The question before this Court today is whether a police officer who conducts a Terry stop can seize the smartphone of a suspect without a warrant and hold it for four days before obtaining a warrant, where the suggested exigency … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Cell phone can’t be seized on RS and exigency then wait four days to get a SW

NPR: Live cameras are tracking faces in New Orleans. Who should control them?

NPR: Live cameras are tracking faces in New Orleans. Who should control them? by Martin Kaste (“New Orleans, home of Bourbon Street revelry, has become the first American city known to have a live facial recognition network. How that came … Continue reading →

Posted in Facial recognition | Comments Off on NPR: Live cameras are tracking faces in New Orleans. Who should control them?

CA8: Merely handling bag on a Greyhound Bus at a stop wasn’t a search or seizure

The officer’s handling defendant’s suitcase on a Greyhound Bus for five seconds to remove it from the bus, just as the driver or baggage handlers would, before asking him for consent was not unreasonable. Defendant validly consented to its search. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA8: Merely handling bag on a Greyhound Bus at a stop wasn’t a search or seizure

CA2: Merely having knowledge of prison strip searches doesn’t make that prison official potentially liable

Merely having knowledge of prison strip searches doesn’t make that prison official potentially liable. Baltas v. Jones, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32676 (2d Cir. Dec. 15, 2025)*:

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA2: Merely having knowledge of prison strip searches doesn’t make that prison official potentially liable

CNS: North Carolina man asks Fourth Circuit to nix child porn flagged by Google algorithm

CNS: North Carolina man asks Fourth Circuit to nix child porn flagged by Google algorithm by Steve Garrison (“A North Carolina man convicted of possessing child pornography asked the Fourth Circuit on Friday to toss out evidence that Google automatically … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on CNS: North Carolina man asks Fourth Circuit to nix child porn flagged by Google algorithm

Today is Bill of Rights Day

The Fourth Amendment and nine others were adopted December 15, 1791, two years after the Constitution.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Today is Bill of Rights Day

CA4: Short interaction in high crime area in daytime wasn’t RS

A short interaction in a high crime area in daytime wasn’t reasonable suspicion, even when the passenger and driver didn’t have the same story. United States v. Hawkins, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32455 (4th Cir. Dec. 11, 2025):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Short interaction in high crime area in daytime wasn’t RS

W.D.La.: Can’t be ineffective for not arguing state constitution in federal criminal case

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing the state constitution in a federal criminal case. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256220 (W.D. La. Dec. 10, 2025). “Here, the affidavit detailed the information on which the officer relied, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Can’t be ineffective for not arguing state constitution in federal criminal case

M.D.Fla.: Suspicious activity reports (SARs) don’t violate the 4A under the third party doctrine

Suspicious activity reports (SARs) don’t violate the Fourth Amendment under the third party doctrine. Fid. Nat’l Fin., Inc. v. Bessent, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255738 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 2025):

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Suspicious activity reports (SARs) don’t violate the 4A under the third party doctrine

W.D.Ky.: A ruse arrest is legal in CA6

Police using a ruse to arrest defendant is legal in the Sixth Circuit. (Not necessarily in the Ninth, but we’re in the Sixth.) It also doesn’t “shock the conscious [sic, quoting a pleading].” United States v. Carmona, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: A ruse arrest is legal in CA6

TX5: Objection to “call detail records” is not a CSLI objection

A boilerplate motion to suppress cell phone records that wasn’t specific was followed up at trial with an objection to “call detail records” was not an objection to CSLI. Griffin v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 9566 (Tex. App. – … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Standing | Comments Off on TX5: Objection to “call detail records” is not a CSLI objection

D.D.C.: Electronic evidence seized in one investigation of Comey cannot be searched years later for evidence in another; return ordered under Rule 41(g)

When the government retained electronic evidence obtained from a lawyer under a warrant, concluded the investigation, and then, years later, searched the information again in a different investigation, the remedy here was order of immediate return to the lawyer and … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Electronic evidence seized in one investigation of Comey cannot be searched years later for evidence in another; return ordered under Rule 41(g)

W.D.Wash.: PC was shown for cell phone data for particular number and any number switched to, if provider knows it

Probable cause was shown for phone records for both the number sought and any number the provider knew that the owner had changed to, even without identifying it. And, good faith applied: “Therefore, even if the continuity provision within the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: PC was shown for cell phone data for particular number and any number switched to, if provider knows it