W.D.N.C.: Court order issued under the SCA was sufficient as a substitute for a warrant

A court order issued under the Stored Communications Act was sufficient as a substitute for a warrant. United States v. Whittaker, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169034 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2025).

“Therefore, in addition to Agent Namey’s experience and explanation, the affidavit’s discussion of the facts about Mr. Waulk’s arrest, including the high-speed chase, the refusal to exit the vehicle, the gun in Mr. Waulk’s waistband, and the evidence recovered from the vehicle further provided Magistrate Judge Pesto, when considering the totality of the circumstances, with a substantial basis for a finding of probable cause to issue the warrant to search the cell phones found in the car.” United States v. Waulk, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168183 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 27, 2025).*

Plaintiff prisoner’s claim that there was a privacy violation in investigating a suspected credit card from originating from prison fails. Papazian v. Trate, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169269 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Stored Communications Act, Warrant requirement. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.