ID: Drug dog’s nose touching a car door handle was not a search

Drug dog’s nose touching a car door handle was not a search. State v. Pendleton, 2025 Ida. App. LEXIS 38 (Aug. 29, 2025).

The defendant officer violated no reasonable expectation of privacy by accessing plaintiff’s public Facebook posts. Dicks v. Fipps, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168485 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 28, 2025).*

There was reasonable suspicion for this stop, and then more to continue it 22 minutes until the drug dog arrived. State v. McLain, 2025 ME 87 (Aug. 29, 2025).*

Defendant’s FST was justified by reasonable suspicion and didn’t unreasonably extend the stop. State v. Hicks, 2025 Kan. App. LEXIS 36 (Aug. 29, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.