UT: Parole absconder’s purse could be searched

The officer said he searched the passenger’s purse in the car as part of the inventory and not as a search incident. In any event, she was a parole absconder, and it could be searched for that reason. State v. Thomas, 2025 UT App 133, 2025 Utah App. LEXIS 136 (Aug. 28, 2025).

The warrant here was with probable cause and executed in good faith. United States v. Hinrichs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168550 (D. Neb. Aug. 29, 2025).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the searches here because there was no basis and there was no basis for a Franks claim. No matter what, the good faith exception would apply. Wesley v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168720 (E.D. Wis. Aug. 29, 2025).*

Prisoner’s complaint about seizure of his legal papers is a conditions of confinement claim, not a Fourth Amendment claim, not cognizable in habeas. Smith v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168695 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 29, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.