MD: Exclusionary rule will not be applied in judicial discipline proceedings

The exclusionary rule will not be applied in judicial discipline proceedings. In re Knapp, 2026 Md. LEXIS 330 (July 17, 2026).

The affidavit for the warrant may have been weak, but more information was given to the issuing magistrate which could be considered, so at least the good faith exception applies. United States v. Blue, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 21231 (6th Cir. July 17, 2026).*

“Defendant argues that the encounter was never consensual and became an unlawful stop when the officers targeted him, circled the block, approached him, ordered him to remove his hand from his pocket, and secured the firearm. The Government responds that the initial contact began as a mere encounter and became an investigative detention only after officers confirmed the presence of a firearm and Defendant failed to produce a permit. [¶] The Court need not decide the precise moment the encounter became a seizure. Even assuming Defendant was seized at the earliest point supported by the record, the officers already had reasonable suspicion by then.” United States v. Chappelle, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159210 (E.D. Pa. July 17, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.