The Record: The NYPD is sending more drones to 911 calls, but privacy advocates don’t like the view

The Record: The NYPD is sending more drones to 911 calls, but privacy advocates don’t like the view by Suzanne Smalley (“City officials say the so-called drones as first responders (DFR) program is making New York safer, but civil liberties and privacy advocates argue that police have not been transparent about operations that allow law enforcement sweeping surveillance capabilities that could easily be abused … Law enforcement agencies deploying DFRs are taking advantage of a lack of legal precedent, said Sidney Thaxter, a senior litigator at the Fourth Amendment Center at the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. While there is case law saying that people have no reasonable right to privacy in their backyard when being observed by a helicopter, courts have not yet ruled on aerial privacy rights under drones, he said. Drones are far smaller, quieter and less noticeable than helicopters, making the court rulings outdated, Thaxter said.”)

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on The Record: The NYPD is sending more drones to 911 calls, but privacy advocates don’t like the view

The Marshall Project: Mississippi’s No-Knock Raids Have Led to Death and Injury. Dozens of Warrants Lacked Clear Justification.

The Marshall Project: Mississippi’s No-Knock Raids Have Led to Death and Injury. Dozens of Warrants Lacked Clear Justification. (“During a 2015 no-knock drug raid in Mississippi’s rural northeast corner, sheriff’s deputies shot and killed 57-year-old Ricky Keeton after he came to the door with an air pistol as SWAT team members forced their way into his trailer home at 1 a.m. Keeton’s death received little public attention at the time. Keeton’s three daughters sued, arguing that Monroe County deputies had no constitutional authority that night to burst into their father’s home with a battering ram and pry bar without first knocking and identifying themselves … Since the Keeton killing in 2015, judges in six courts across the state have approved at least 62 no-knock search warrants that failed to show that they met basic constitutional standards, an investigation by The Marshall Project–Jackson and the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal found.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Marshall Project: Mississippi’s No-Knock Raids Have Led to Death and Injury. Dozens of Warrants Lacked Clear Justification.

Reason: Warrantless Home Searches Under the Alien Enemies Act?

Reason: The Volokh Conspiracy: Warrantless Home Searches Under the Alien Enemies Act? by Orin S. Kerr:

Continue reading
Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on Reason: Warrantless Home Searches Under the Alien Enemies Act?

OR: Following def in an unmarked police car is not a seizure, and he voluntarily stopped

Following defendant in an unmarked car was not a seizure. Defendant ultimately voluntarily stopped and talked to the officer. State v. Serini, 2025 Ore. App. LEXIS 446 (Mar. 19, 2025).*

When defendant was placed in the patrol car, the officer had reasonable suspicion that he was under the influence. Martinez-Orta v. State, 2025 Ind. App. LEXIS 78 (Mar. 18, 2025).*

The person handing over a bag of ammunition had apparent authority to do so, and the contents of the bag were immediately apparently. United States v. Smith, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6399 (4th Cir. Mar. 19, 2025).*

To the extent the sufficiency of evidence argument could be construed to be a suppression of evidence argument, it was waived by failing to present it below. Henry v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 174 (Mar. 19, 2025).*

Posted in Apparent authority, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on OR: Following def in an unmarked police car is not a seizure, and he voluntarily stopped

AK: Public court filings violate no REP

“Herndon’s argument that her rights under the Fourth Amendment were violated when the superior court ‘commingled [her] private filings making it public’ is without merit. Herndon has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information that she voluntarily submitted to the government.” In re A Change of Name for Herndon, 2025 Alas. LEXIS 42 (Mar. 19, 2025).*

The officer was looking for a red Honda Civic and saw defendant in one as it passed him near the scene of the alleged crime. There was reasonable suspicion for the stop. “Looking at the totality of the circumstances here–the ‘whole picture’–if Richey was a ‘close question’ on reasonable suspicion, this case lands much closer to a slam dunk.” State v. Solom, 2025 Wisc. App. LEXIS 262 (Mar. 19, 2025).*

There are questions of fact as to both the justification for the stop and the use of force here. Summary judgment denied. Q.M. v. Cty. of L.A., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49466 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2025).*

2254 successor petition for a later probation search is barred. In re Barringer, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6358 (11th Cir. Mar. 18, 2025).*

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Public court filings violate no REP

GA: Dog sniff of car while citation being filled out did not extend stop; suppression reversed

While the stopping officer was filling out the citation, a second officer arrived. The dog sniff occurred while the citation was still being filled out, so it didn’t extend the stop. Grant of motion to suppress reversed. State v. Dean, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 143 (Mar. 19, 2025).

“Here, arresting officers relied on a series of facts connecting the Santander and Citibank Robberies to Mr. Brito. That some of those facts might have been innocuous when considered in isolation does not disturb this Court’s conclusion that the same facts, when considered together, established probable cause that Mr. Brito committed the Santander and Citibank Robberies, and thus established probable cause arrest Mr. Brito on November 30, 2023.” United States v. Brito, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49309 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2025).*

Defendant claims he innocently knocked on a door, but the occupant thought it was beating on the door and a burglary was about to happen and she called the police. There was reasonable suspicion when the police showed up and he was the only person there. “Even if Defendant was merely knocking on Wilson’s door as he contends, officers do not have to eliminate all innocent behaviors for there to be reasonable suspicion. … Given the totality of the circumstances, the Court finds that officers had reasonable suspicion to believe a crime was occurring and that Defendant was the person committing the crime.” United States v. Williams, No. 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49131 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 18, 2025).*

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Dog sniff of car while citation being filled out did not extend stop; suppression reversed

D.P.R.: Officers’ reliance on differing versions of weapons law was objectively reasonable

The Spanish and English versions of a section of the Puerto Rico Weapons Law differ with “and” and “or” and reliance on whichever is objectively reasonable under Heien. United States v. Rosa-Ufred, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49334 (D.P.R. Mar. 14, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Officers’ reliance on differing versions of weapons law was objectively reasonable

CA10: Siccing police dog on sleeping man wasn’t subject to QI

Siccing a police dog on a sleeping man not subject to qualified immunity. Luethje v. Kyle, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6385 (10th Cir. Mar. 19, 2025).

The CI’s information on a video showed his basis of knowledge and provided probable cause. State v. Hawkins, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 868 (5th Dist. Mar. 17, 2025).*

Warrantless arrest of a parole violator without a warrant doesn’t state a Fourth Amendment claim. Hobbs v. Mich. Parole Bd., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48768 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2025).*

The delay in getting a search warrant here was reasonable and justified by other investigative activities in this case, including a criminal complaint and a grand jury presentation. United States v. Witherspoon, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49040 (E.D. Ky. Jan. 29, 2025).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: Siccing police dog on sleeping man wasn’t subject to QI

N.D.Ind.: There was PC for stop, and pretext claim was speculative and didn’t merit hearing

Defendant’s claim that the officer was acting pretextually in stopping him is speculative at best. “Mr. Ellis also argues that the traffic stop was pretextual. However, an officer’s ‘actual motivations’ and ‘[s]ubjective intentions play no role in ordinary, probable-cause Fourth Amendment analysis.’ Whren, 517 U.S. at 813. Therefore, even if the traffic stop was pretextual, it does not alter the Court’s conclusion that Lt. Bartlett had probable cause to initiate the traffic stop.” One doesn’t automatically get a hearing to flesh out speculation. As for prolonging the stop, it was reasonable based on the return on insurance information which defendant’s wasn’t carrying. United States v. Ellis, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48991 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 18, 2025).*

“Upon learning that Mr. Binion’s license was suspended, the officers had probable cause to arrest him for driving with a suspended license. The officers then searched Mr. Binion, which the officers were permitted to do under the search incident to arrest exception to the warrant requirement. See Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. 435, 449 (2013). When the officers recovered suspected narcotics and money from Mr. Binion’s pockets, the officers then had probable cause to believe that Mr. Binion committed a crime involving controlled substances. Mr. Binion’s arrest was therefore lawful.” Then the vehicle search was permitted, too. United States v. Binion, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48999 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 18, 2025).*

Posted in Pretext, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: There was PC for stop, and pretext claim was speculative and didn’t merit hearing

N.D.Miss.: Summers didn’t support transporting person to jail whose house was being searched

Plaintiff’s house was searched on a warrant. There was no probable cause as to him at the time. It was unreasonable under Summers to transport him in handcuffs to the jail to be questioned for five hours and then released. Holliday v. Monroe Cty., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49020 (N.D. Miss. Mar. 18, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: Summers didn’t support transporting person to jail whose house was being searched

E.D.Mich.: Ptf’s jail strip search on camera after contact visit was reasonable

Plaintiff’s jail strip search after a contact visit was reasonable, and the fact it was on camera doesn’t make it unreasonable. Parker v. Robert J. White Mich. Dep’t of Corr., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48519 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 27, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Ptf’s jail strip search on camera after contact visit was reasonable

CA9: No QI for nearly destroying a house in a search for a person to arrest

Summary judgment and qualified immunity were properly denied where officers searching for someone other than the plaintiff in plaintiff’s house [apparently] gratuitously nearly destroyed it, breaking all windows, toilets, leaving water running in the house, appliances, furniture, and a car outside. Denby v. Engstrom, No. 23-15658, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6271 (9th Cir. Mar. 18, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: No QI for nearly destroying a house in a search for a person to arrest

ARS Technica: Everything you say to your Echo will be sent to Amazon starting on March 28

ARS Technica: Everything you say to your Echo will be sent to Amazon starting on March 28 by Scharon Harding:

Continue reading
Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ARS Technica: Everything you say to your Echo will be sent to Amazon starting on March 28

D.Minn.: SW’s failure to include motel name, address, and room number failed particularity

The search warrant was ostensibly for a particular Motel 6 and room number, but the warrant completely omitted reference to the place to be searched. United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47675 (D. Minn. Mar. 13, 2025).

When witnesses to a shooting said that an SUV contained either suspects in the shooting or witnesses to it, there was reasonable suspicion to stop it. As for search of a cell phone, the warrant authorized search and seizure of “any and all” information and things on it, and defendant argued it was a general warrant. However, Officer “Ebert testified that he simply used standard department language that had been approved on many previous occasions.” The good faith exception applied. “We need not consider, and take no position on whether the district court correctly concluded that the cell phone warrant ‘was insufficiently particular and unconstitutionally overbroad.’” United States v. Williams, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6230 (8th Cir. Mar. 18, 2025).

The critical six seconds of video of this shooting supports the officer’s version and not plaintiff’s so qualified immunity applies. Denk v. Miller, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6180 (9th Cir. Mar. 17, 2025).*

There was probable cause for the warrant for defendant’s BAC. People v. Coble, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 2061 (Mar. 17, 2025).*

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: SW’s failure to include motel name, address, and room number failed particularity

PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

Defendant’s conviction for obstructing a search is affirmed. He was not entitled to a jury instruction that he had to have seen or read the warrant first where it was not disputed that he knew there was a warrant. Commonwealth v. Sow, 2025 PA Super 63 (Mar. 17, 2025).

The delay in procuring a warrant for electronic data the government had was justified. The investigation progressed as the officers learned more and more justifying the warrant. United States v. Witherspoon, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47677 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 17, 2025).*

An ineffective assistance of counsel claim requires a valid Fourth Amendment claim, and here there isn’t one. “In arguing that his counsel should have filed a motion to suppress, Johnson does not cite any statutory or constitutional right, nor any rule of evidence, that was violated by the introduction of the guns. Instead, Johnson points to the evidence and asks the Court to find the basis for a potential motion to suppress.” It doesn’t work that way. United States v. Witherspoon, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47677 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 17, 2025).*

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

CA7: No QI for 2015 detention of 16 year old without justification

Officers are denied qualified immunity winning at trial for his false detention four days before Christmas nearly a decade ago. The law was clearly established plaintiff couldn’t be detained like this for no apparent reason. Taylor v. Schwarzhuber, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6198 (7th Cir. Mar. 17, 2025)*:

Continue reading
Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: No QI for 2015 detention of 16 year old without justification

CA9: Failure to tell def of precise reason for arrest when no warrant in hand did not warrant suppression

Suppression of defendant’s statements is not warranted for FBI agents’ violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 4(c)(3)(A), which provides that an arresting officer who does not possess a copy of the arrest warrant “must inform the defendant of the warrant’s existence and of the offense charged.” Here, it is illogical to conclude that the agents’ failure to tell him the precise charges prompted his incriminating statements; his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was not implicated as he was not yet in custody; and there was no evidence that the agents engaged in the kind of deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent conduct that the exclusionary rule is meant to deter. United States v. Rodriguez-Arvizu, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6205 (9th Cir. Mar. 17, 2025).

Nexus to defendant’s cell phone was provided by disclosure from “Sky ECC communications that were provided by the French government.” United States v. Gogic, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48254 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2025).*

Defendant was stopped because the officer ran his LPN to confirm he was the owner, ran him through a police intel database and the courts’ online docket finding investigations and cases, and he had reasonable suspicion to continue the stop by the time the drug dog arrived. Also, he delayed the stop because he was alone and he could see other officers on the screen approaching by their GPS. State v. Johnson, 2025-Ohio-890 (11th Dist. Mar. 17, 2025).*

Posted in Dog sniff, Exclusionary rule, Foreign searches, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Failure to tell def of precise reason for arrest when no warrant in hand did not warrant suppression

The Intercept: DEA Insiders Warned About Legality of Phone Tracking Program. Their Concerns Were Kept Secret.

The Intercept: DEA Insiders Warned About Legality of Phone Tracking Program. Their Concerns Were Kept Secret. (“The DEA ignored the internal alarm about its Hemisphere mass phone data collection program, according to newly revealed details in a government report.”) It is: A Review of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Use of Administrative Subpoenas to Collect or Exploit Bulk Data (Revised March 2025; originally March 2019).

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Intercept: DEA Insiders Warned About Legality of Phone Tracking Program. Their Concerns Were Kept Secret.

Reason: Taking $200 Out of an ATM Should Not Trigger Federal Financial Surveillance: No, not even if you do it in a county that borders Mexico.

Reason: Taking $200 Out of an ATM Should Not Trigger Federal Financial Surveillance: No, not even if you do it in a county that borders Mexico. by Joe Lancaster (“One of President Donald Trump’s Day 1 executive orders designated ‘certain international cartels’ as ‘foreign terrorist organizations,’ a classification that according to the State Department ‘play[s] a critical role in our fight against terrorism and [is] an effective means of curtailing support for terrorist activities and pressuring groups to get out of the terrorism business.’ To that end, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced a new rule cracking down on cash transactions this week, but only in certain geographical regions. No matter the administration’s intent to target cartels, the rule will expand government surveillance of its citizens. FinCEN ‘issued a Geographic Targeting Order (GTO) to further combat the illicit activities and money laundering of Mexico-based cartels and other criminal actors along the southwest border of the United States,’ according to the announcement. ‘The GTO requires all money services businesses (MSBs) located in 30 ZIP codes across California and Texas near the southwest border to file Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs) with FinCEN at a $200 threshold, in connection with cash transactions.'”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Reason: Taking $200 Out of an ATM Should Not Trigger Federal Financial Surveillance: No, not even if you do it in a county that borders Mexico.

D.D.C.: BLM 1A speech restriction claim can proceed as a class action

A class claim for the June 2020 Lafayette Square BLM protest is certified for the First Amendment speech restriction claims but not the retaliation claims because they do not satisfy commonality under Rule 23(a). Damages claims can be pursued separately. Black Lives Matter D.C. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47417 (D.D.C. Mar. 14, 2025).

Not calling a paramedic at the scene whose report said defendant wasn’t under the influence wasn’t ineffective assistance of counsel. The paramedic’s testimony was that he got that orally from the defendant, which he had to accept. The trial court at the suppression hearing found the officer credible that defendant was under the influence. In light of that, it was speculative now that the paramedic would have sufficiently contradicted the officer to be more believable. State v. Harris, 2025-Ohio-825 (4th Dist. Mar. 6, 2025).*

After a shooting in Boston, the defendants fled to one defendant’s mother’s place where the other changed clothes. Nexus for a warrant for her apartment was shown. Commonwealth v. Phillips, 2025 Mass. LEXIS 107 (Mar. 13, 2025).*

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on D.D.C.: BLM 1A speech restriction claim can proceed as a class action