GA: Dog sniff of car while citation being filled out did not extend stop; suppression reversed

While the stopping officer was filling out the citation, a second officer arrived. The dog sniff occurred while the citation was still being filled out, so it didn’t extend the stop. Grant of motion to suppress reversed. State v. Dean, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 143 (Mar. 19, 2025).

“Here, arresting officers relied on a series of facts connecting the Santander and Citibank Robberies to Mr. Brito. That some of those facts might have been innocuous when considered in isolation does not disturb this Court’s conclusion that the same facts, when considered together, established probable cause that Mr. Brito committed the Santander and Citibank Robberies, and thus established probable cause arrest Mr. Brito on November 30, 2023.” United States v. Brito, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49309 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2025).*

Defendant claims he innocently knocked on a door, but the occupant thought it was beating on the door and a burglary was about to happen and she called the police. There was reasonable suspicion when the police showed up and he was the only person there. “Even if Defendant was merely knocking on Wilson’s door as he contends, officers do not have to eliminate all innocent behaviors for there to be reasonable suspicion. … Given the totality of the circumstances, the Court finds that officers had reasonable suspicion to believe a crime was occurring and that Defendant was the person committing the crime.” United States v. Williams, No. 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49131 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 18, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.