AK: Public court filings violate no REP

“Herndon’s argument that her rights under the Fourth Amendment were violated when the superior court ‘commingled [her] private filings making it public’ is without merit. Herndon has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information that she voluntarily submitted to the government.” In re A Change of Name for Herndon, 2025 Alas. LEXIS 42 (Mar. 19, 2025).*

The officer was looking for a red Honda Civic and saw defendant in one as it passed him near the scene of the alleged crime. There was reasonable suspicion for the stop. “Looking at the totality of the circumstances here–the ‘whole picture’–if Richey was a ‘close question’ on reasonable suspicion, this case lands much closer to a slam dunk.” State v. Solom, 2025 Wisc. App. LEXIS 262 (Mar. 19, 2025).*

There are questions of fact as to both the justification for the stop and the use of force here. Summary judgment denied. Q.M. v. Cty. of L.A., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49466 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2025).*

2254 successor petition for a later probation search is barred. In re Barringer, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6358 (11th Cir. Mar. 18, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.