CA8: Alleged degrading strip search of transgender inmate stated claim

An allegedly retaliatory prison strip search alleged to be degrading and too intrusive stated a claim and survived qualified immunity on the Fourth Amendment but not the First Amendment retaliation claim. The inmate was transgender transitioning to female. Beard v. Falkenrath, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 8025 (8th Cir. Apr. 4, 2024):

Continue reading
Posted in Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA8: Alleged degrading strip search of transgender inmate stated claim

TechCrunch: ‘Reverse’ searches: The sneaky ways that police tap tech companies for your private data

TechCrunch: ‘Reverse’ searches: The sneaky ways that police tap tech companies for your private data by Zack Whittaker (“U.S. police departments are increasingly relying on a controversial surveillance practice to demand large amounts of users’ data from tech companies, with the aim of identifying criminal suspects.”).

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on TechCrunch: ‘Reverse’ searches: The sneaky ways that police tap tech companies for your private data

D.N.M.: Def’s IAC claim was frivolous

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim, including his Fourth Amendment claim, raised at sentencing was essentially frivolous. Defense counsel negotiated a time served disposition that defendants rejected. The minimum punishment after the guilty verdict was life. The Fourth Amendment claims were extensively litigated and lost. United States v. Wahhaj, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59915 (D.N.M. Apr. 1, 2024)*:

Continue reading
Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def’s IAC claim was frivolous

Phila. Inquirer: Why did more than 1,000 people in the U.S. die after police subdued them with force that isn’t meant to kill?

Phila. Inquirer: Why did more than 1,000 people in the U.S. die after police subdued them with force that isn’t meant to kill? by Reese Dunklin, Ryan J. Foley, Jeff Martin, Jennifer McDermott, Holbrook Mohr, and John Seewer, Associated Press (“Black people made up a third of those who died despite representing only 12% of the U.S. population.”)

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Phila. Inquirer: Why did more than 1,000 people in the U.S. die after police subdued them with force that isn’t meant to kill?

NPR: Google to delete search data of millions who used ‘incognito’ mode

NPR: Google to delete search data of millions who used ‘incognito’ mode by Bobby Allyn (“Google will destroy the private browsing history of millions of people who used ‘incognito’ mode in its Chrome browser as a part of a settlement filed to federal court on Monday in a case over the company’s secret tracking of web activity.”)

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on NPR: Google to delete search data of millions who used ‘incognito’ mode

Reason: Judge Quashes Felony Murder Charges Against Former Houston Cop Whose Lies Led to a Deadly 2019 Drug Raid

Reason: Judge Quashes Felony Murder Charges Against Former Houston Cop Whose Lies Led to a Deadly 2019 Drug Raid by Jacob Sullen (“Gerald Goines’ lawyers argued that the indictment did not adequately specify the underlying felony of tampering with a government document.”)

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: Judge Quashes Felony Murder Charges Against Former Houston Cop Whose Lies Led to a Deadly 2019 Drug Raid

CA7: False arrest claims before trial are 4A claims; due process after trial

“Claims for false arrest prior to trial are appropriately considered under the Fourth Amendment, not the Fourteenth Amendment. Manuel v. City of Joliet, Illinois, 580 U.S. 357, 367 (2017) (‘If the complaint is that a form of legal process resulted in pretrial detention unsupported by probable cause, then the right allegedly lies in the Fourth Amendment.’); Lewis v. City of Chicago, 914 F.3d 472, 478 (7th Cir. 2019) (‘It’s now clear that a § 1983 claim for unlawful pretrial detention rests exclusively on the Fourth Amendment.’).” Madero v. McGuinness, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7653 n.6 (7th Cir. Apr. 1, 2024).*

“Whether a person has been seized or detained under the Fourth Amendment is a factual finding that is reviewed for clear error. … ‘Whether law enforcement has reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop is a legal conclusion that is reviewed de novo.’” “In light of the evidence and all the circumstances surrounding the incident, we cannot say that the district court clearly erred in determining that Leon-Hernandez was seized when an agent demanded his car keys, as prior to that, there was not a sufficient show of authority to constitute detention.” United States v. Leon-Hernandez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7667 (5th Cir. Apr. 1, 2024).*

Defendant was driving his girlfriend’s car and abandoned it. She could consent to its search. A towel draped over part of a rifle was not an enclosure. United States v. Williams, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7584 (8th Cir. Apr. 1, 2024).*

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Immigration arrests, Seizure | Comments Off on CA7: False arrest claims before trial are 4A claims; due process after trial

MN: The state const. doesn’t bar geofence warrants, and this one was issued with PC under 4A and state constitution

Syllabus: “Geofence warrants, which authorize law enforcement to obtain location-history data of cellular devices that were within a defined area during a specified time frame, are not categorically prohibited by the United States and Minnesota Constitutions as general warrants, but instead are to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis according to established constitutional principles.” State v. Contreras-Sanchez, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 167 (Apr. 1, 2024):

Continue reading
Posted in geofence, State constitution | Comments Off on MN: The state const. doesn’t bar geofence warrants, and this one was issued with PC under 4A and state constitution

ID: Stop based on alleged unconstitutional regulations was in good faith and not suppressed

A traffic stop based on allegedly unconstitutional regulations was still reasonable. The officer did nothing wrong. State v. Van Zanten, 2024 Ida. LEXIS 34 (Apr. 1, 2024):

Continue reading
Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on ID: Stop based on alleged unconstitutional regulations was in good faith and not suppressed

CA9: Inventory of backpack before handing it to released defendant was reasonable and within policy

Defendant’s backpack was lawfully inventory searched by the police before returning it to him after he’d been released. They substantially complied with policy. United States v. Sapalasan, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7580 (9th Cir. Apr. 1, 2024) (2-1).

A motion to quash a DNA search warrant four years into the case for lateness and citing no law nor making cogent argument is deemed waived. State v. Wilson, 2024 Haw. App. LEXIS 157 (Mar. 28, 2024).*

Plaintiff’s car was towed by a towing company. There is no municipal liability here, and the towing company doesn’t qualify as a state actor. Robertson v. Breakthrough Towing, LLC, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58533 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2024).*

State prisoner “Mr. Morris alleges a right to protection, safe housing, and adequate medical care under the Fourth Amendment.” This doesn’t state a Fourth Amendment claim. Morris v. Patterson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58632 (D. Colo. Mar. 29, 2024).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Inventory | Comments Off on CA9: Inventory of backpack before handing it to released defendant was reasonable and within policy

Three on post-conviction and defaulted 4A claims

“Defendant has procedurally defaulted on this claim by never filing a motion to suppress the evidence, but instead pleading guilty. Moreover, a Fourth Amendment claim such as this one is not cognizable on a § 2255 motion. Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 (1976). Stone applies to Fourth Amendment claims brought in § 2255 motions. Ray v. United States, 721 F.3d 758, 761-762 (6th Cir. 2013).” United States v. Wiggins, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57881 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 28, 2024).*

“To the extent Blazejowski asserts a Fourth Amendment claim or Brady and Giglio violations, the Court finds her claims are unexhausted because she failed to raise them in her direct appeal or in her postconviction filings. Since future attempts to exhaust these claims would be futile, the claims are procedurally defaulted.” Blazejowski v. Sec’y, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55321 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2024).*

NYS has always provided a full and fair opportunity to litigate Fourth Amendment claims in criminal cases, and that applies here. Petitioner had the opportunity. “Valdiviezo next claims that he is actually innocent. … This claim is frivolous.” First, the proof at trial was overwhelming. Second, “he argues that the detectives in his case procured false evidence which was admitted against him at trial — an allegation he fails to back up with any proof.” Valdiviezo v. Shanley, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55345 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2024).*

Posted in Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on Three on post-conviction and defaulted 4A claims

NV: The state’s ability to seize a cell phone with exigency doesn’t include the power to search it

The ability to seize a cell phone with exigent circumstances doesn’t include the state’s ability to search it without a warrant. Smith v. State, 2024 Nev. LEXIS 14 (Mar. 28, 2024).

Defendant wasn’t seized when the officer first approached him. Williamson v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58157 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 29, 2024).*

“Once Lt. McConnell ascertained during the traffic stop that Tyree was illegally driving under an FRA/noncompliance suspension and that she had a prior DUS suspension, he was lawfully able (and required) to tow the vehicle.” The inventory was valid. State v. Tyree, 2024-Ohio-1186 (2d Dist. Mar. 29, 2024).*

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on NV: The state’s ability to seize a cell phone with exigency doesn’t include the power to search it

CA11: There was PC to take def’s picture in public; seizure question moot

Regardless of whether defendant was seized, there was probable case to encounter him and take his picture in a public place. United States v. Daniels, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7522 (11th Cir. Mar. 29, 2024).

Defendant wasn’t seized when he interacted with a law enforcement officer on a convenience store lot where it was all non-threatening and not coercive. Plenty of other people were around. United States v. Moten, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55625 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2024).*

This stop was justified. “Here, the dash-cam video clearly shows that Garcia gave unrestricted consent to search his vehicle after he had been Mirandized and being told he could refuse to consent. Although the dash-cam reflects that at some point Garcia withdrew his consent to search, it was untimely as by then the officers had already discovered the drugs. For these reasons, the defendant’s challenge of the search is denied.” United States v. Garcia, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56789 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 28, 2024).*

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: There was PC to take def’s picture in public; seizure question moot

D.C.Cir.: Telling def to “chill out” not a seizure

“Officer Jones never made such a show of authority; he simply told Hagan, while in uniform and in a ‘conversational tone,’ to ‘chill out.’ … Jones neither told Hagan to stop nor asked him any questions. An approach by a uniformed police officer is not a seizure.” United States v. Hagan, No. 22-3089, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7506 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 29, 2024).

The details from the CI and inferences from what was known and observations added up to probable cause. United States v. Yates, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7443 (2d Cir. Mar. 29, 2024).*

The Quarles public safety exception can apply to statements taken at the police station after arrest. State v. Starr, 2024 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 33 (Mar. 29, 2024)* (quoting, inter alia, Trice v. United States, 662 A.2d 891, 893, 896 (D.C. 1995)).

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Telling def to “chill out” not a seizure

OSHA final rule permits representatives of company on walk through inspections

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Final rule. [Effective 60 days after publication in Federal Register]
SUMMARY: In this final rule, OSHA is amending its Representatives of Employers and Employees [i.e., union reps] regulation to clarify that the representative(s) authorized by employees may be an employee of the employer or a third party; such third-party employee representative(s) may accompany the OSHA Compliance Safety and Health Officer (CSHO) when, in the judgment of the CSHO, good cause has been shown why they are reasonably necessary to aid in the inspection. In the final rule, OSHA also clarified that a third party may be reasonably necessary because of their relevant knowledge, skills, or experience with hazards or conditions in the workplace or similar workplaces, or language or communication skills. OSHA concluded that these clarifications aid OSHA’s workplace inspections by better enabling employees to select representative(s) of their choice to accompany the CSHO during a physical workplace inspection. Employee representation during the inspection is critically important to ensuring OSHA obtains the necessary information about worksite conditions and hazards.

Update: JacksonLewis: OSHA’s New Walkaround Rule Raises Unionization, Constitutional Concerns for Employers

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on OSHA final rule permits representatives of company on walk through inspections

IL and DWB, driving while black

There was no lawful basis for defendant’s stop – it was a case of DWB, driving while black, something that needs to be confronted. Reversed. People v. Carpenter, 2024 IL App (1st) 220970, 2024 Ill. App. LEXIS 749 (Mar. 29, 2024):

Continue reading
Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on IL and DWB, driving while black

E.D.Pa.: Nexus can be shown by inference

There was probable cause as to defendant’s house, with nexus a strong inference: “Here, the officers, applying their training and experience to the facts before them, reasonably inferred that Mitchell was a drug dealer and was carrying drugs and other contraband back and forth between the center of the operations on Griscom Street and the Metro Club Condos. Based on observation, security footage, and conversations with Metro Club Condo Management, Officers were able to associate Mitchell with Defendant, who resided in Unit 912 under an alias.” Moreover, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Barksdale, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54638 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 2024).*

The district court rejected defendant’s attempt at a conditional plea preserving his Fourth Amendment claim. He pled guilty anyway, and that’s waiver. United States v. Herrera, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54842 (S.D. Miss. Mar. 27, 2024).*

The protective sweep was justified. Defendant was arrested right inside the door, but he had a violent history, associated with gang members, and others were in the house. United States v. Terrazas, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7245 (5th Cir. Mar. 27, 2024).*

Posted in Nexus, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Nexus can be shown by inference

D.Minn.: Hidden compartment could be searched under automobile exception

Under the automobile exception, a search of a compartment underneath the dashboard paneling was reasonable. United States v. Payton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57065 (D. Minn. Mar. 29, 2024).*

The search issues on appeal weren’t the issues in the trial court, so they’re waived. To the extent they can be reviewed at all, defendant still loses. People v. Ayala, 2024 NY Slip Op 01768 (1st Dept. Mar. 28, 2024).*

“Here, there is no reason for this Court to disregard the discretion exercised by the [trial] Court in its determination of credibility. The description of the events and the parties in the warrant application and of the actual search, and the consistency of the witness’s testimony at the Darden hearing, establish the identity of the confidential informant (see People v Lambey, 197 AD3d 728).” People v. Huginnie, 2024 NY Slip Op 01726 (2d Dept. Mar. 27, 2024).*

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Scope of search, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Hidden compartment could be searched under automobile exception

CA6: It’s clearly established that RS or PC required for a traffic stop

It was clearly established at the time that reasonable suspicion or probable cause was required for a traffic stop. Fact issues remain, so no qualified immunity. King v. City of Rockford, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7327 (6th Cir. Mar. 28, 2024).*

Plaintiff was alleged to have taken a car at gunpoint, and a police chase ensued. After he crashed from a PIT maneuver and fled the car, he was Tased and punched in the back of the head to subdue him. The force used was not unreasonable. Aguilar v. Knueppel, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7213 (9th Cir. Mar. 27, 2024).*

There are undisputed facts showing qualified immunity. White v. Hamilton Cty., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7263 (6th Cir. Mar. 25, 2024).*

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: It’s clearly established that RS or PC required for a traffic stop

CA8: Police placed a hidden camera across from def’s apt door and used information from it in showing PC for SW; there was PC without it

“Darron Mayo appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a hidden camera police officers placed across from his apartment door. Officers used some of the evidence obtained from the camera in a probable cause affidavit supporting an application for a search warrant of Mayo’s apartment. We affirm the district court because the probable cause affidavit was sufficient when ignoring evidence gathered from the hidden camera.” United States v. Mayo, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7305 (8th Cir. Mar. 28, 2024).

On de novo review, the stop and search of the car in which defendant was a passenger was reasonable. Search incident in a bank fraud arrest for possession of credit cards of others was reasonable. The state’s argument that first suppression issue was forfeited for not being presented in the trial court is acknowledged but not decided. People v. Hatcher, 2024 IL App (1st) 220455, 2024 Ill. App. LEXIS 722 (Mar. 27, 2024).*

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim fails because he doesn’t even allege that the outcome of the case would have been different if a motion to suppress had been granted. United States v. Foreman, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54477 (D. Md. Mar. 25, 2024).*

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Pole cameras, Search incident | Comments Off on CA8: Police placed a hidden camera across from def’s apt door and used information from it in showing PC for SW; there was PC without it