OH1: SW for residence justified seizure of text messages about drug transactions received during execution of warrant

The warrant for defendant’s residence was based on an affidavit that provided a minimally sufficient nexus between the offenses under investigation and the need to search the home, and the officers acted in good-faith reliance on the warrant. Also, two text messages referencing a drug transaction sent to defendant during the execution of the search warrant was admissible because they directly proved that defendant had the intent and knowledge to sell the drugs he possessed on that day, a necessary element to establish the charged offenses. State v. Madaris, 2026-Ohio-2305, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 2280 (1st Dist. June 18, 2026).

“Johnson further contends that the search warrant and arrest warrant were issued without probable cause and that the supporting affidavits omitted material information and were therefore constitutionally defective. … These claims are barred from federal habeas review.” Stone v. Powell. Johnson v. Dir., Tex. Dep’t of Crim. Just.-Corr. Insts. Div., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136365 (N.D. Tex. May 9, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Issue preclusion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.