Category Archives: Cell phones

MD: Waiting 20 days to get cell phone SW after seizure was reasonable here

Police seized defendant’s cell phone and sought to have it examined. It went into the queue at the forensic unit, and, when it was ready to be searched, they then sought a warrant. They waited because they believed there was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MD: Waiting 20 days to get cell phone SW after seizure was reasonable here

IN: State rule that consent to search carries with it a right to consult counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state acting on their own

Conflict of laws: Indiana’s Pirtle rule that consent searches afford a right to consult with counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state that encounter defendant and get consent to search. Mendenhall v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 81 (Mar. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Conflict of laws, Consent, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on IN: State rule that consent to search carries with it a right to consult counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state acting on their own

TN: Drug history essentially shows nexus to cell phone

Defendant’s drug history was essentially enough to show nexus to a cell phone. State v. White, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 131 (Mar. 13, 2026). A civil standby with a police officer for an apartment inspection didn’t violate the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Private search, Search | Comments Off on TN: Drug history essentially shows nexus to cell phone

Cal.6: GFE applies to California Electronic Communications Privacy Act searches

A dead co-conspirator’s phone was searched linking defendants to the crime. The police reasonably believed his mother had authority to consent to the phone. The California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA) (Cal. Pen. Code § 1546 et seq.) applies, and … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent | Comments Off on Cal.6: GFE applies to California Electronic Communications Privacy Act searches

Army: PC shown for picture files in other apps on cell phone

There was probable cause to search the picture files in defendant’s cell phone beyond the app defendant used. It was reasonable to conclude pictures could be moved between places on the phone. United States v. Ingram, 2026 CCA LEXIS 119 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Collective knowledge, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Army: PC shown for picture files in other apps on cell phone

NY3: Housing law that requires landlords to submit to premises and records searches is unconstitutional

Section 8 housing law that requires landlords to submit to premises and records searches is unconstitutional. Matter of People of the State of N.Y. v. Commons W., LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 01253 (3d Dept. Mar. 5, 2026). Leave to … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NY3: Housing law that requires landlords to submit to premises and records searches is unconstitutional

E.D.N.Y.: Inevitable discovery doesn’t cure errors

Defendant’s cell phone was unreasonably seized and the contents suppressed. Inevitable discovery isn’t as broad as the government argues. United States v. Patchiav, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47106 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2026)*:

Posted in Cell phones, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Inevitable discovery doesn’t cure errors

D.Neb.: Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents

Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents. Moss v. Jeffreys, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45716 (D. Neb. Mar. 4, 2026) (§ 60.58 n.2) 2255 petitioner’s claim that defense counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents

CA4: Error to deny suppression motion without hearing where there’s disputed facts

The district court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress without a hearing when there were disputed facts. United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6196 (4th Cir. Mar. 3, 2026). Defendant consented orally and in writing to search … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Issue preclusion, Nexus, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA4: Error to deny suppression motion without hearing where there’s disputed facts

W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

The government seized this Oklahoman’s cell phone and searched it with a warrant. Oklahoma is largely marijuana legal. Pleading the crime-fraud exception, the government bears the burden of segregating the valid conversations from the federal conspiracy allegations. Defendant bears no … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

M.D.Fla.: Frisk on entering VA hospital was justified on RS

Defendant’s frisk on entering a VA hospital could be justified as an area entry search, but the facts known to the officers, that defendant was already considered a safety risk, justified it by reasonable suspicion under Terry. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Frisk on entering VA hospital was justified on RS

CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

Off-site copying of defendant’s cell phone after the warrant’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B). United States v. Hernandez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 4990 (11th Cir. Feb. 19, 2026). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

It’s not constitutionally required to show that a cell phone was actually used in a crime for probable cause to search it. It’s enough that it likely could have. “A law enforcement-affiant’s personal expertise combined with attestation to a defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

AL: Trial court erred in finding cell phone SW didn’t provide for seizure and then search

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone authorized both seizure and search of the phone, and the trial court was clearly erroneous in concluding that it did not permit a search, too. (The officer admitted working off a template cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AL: Trial court erred in finding cell phone SW didn’t provide for seizure and then search

M.D.Fla.: Postal workers have no REP in their work trucks

Postal workers have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their work trucks. It’s owned by the USPS and others always have access and they well know they are subject to surveillance on the job. United States v. Ayala, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Postal workers have no REP in their work trucks

404 Media: FBI Couldn’t Get into WaPo Reporter’s iPhone Because It Had Lockdown Mode Enabled

404 Media: FBI Couldn’t Get into WaPo Reporter’s iPhone Because It Had Lockdown Mode Enabled by Joseph Cox (“Lockdown Mode is a sometimes overlooked feature of Apple devices that broadly make them harder to hack. A court record indicates the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on 404 Media: FBI Couldn’t Get into WaPo Reporter’s iPhone Because It Had Lockdown Mode Enabled

CT: Last person to contact victim alive was PC for his phone

Defendant was sexually involved with the victim, and he apparently was the last person to see her alive, and had contact with her after she disappeared. That was probable cause. State v. Johnson, 2026 Conn. LEXIS 19 (Feb. 3, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CT: Last person to contact victim alive was PC for his phone

ID: Potential for destruction of evidence on cell phone was justification for its seizure

Defendant was reported for video voyeurism of his stepdaughter in the bathroom, and police got his phone, telling him they were seizing it. Then they got a warrant. The potential for destruction of evidence was sufficient justification for a warrantless … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on ID: Potential for destruction of evidence on cell phone was justification for its seizure

N.D.Iowa: Nexus shown to cell phone in harassing letters case

The ubiquity of cell phones makes them likely sources of evidence in crimes. Here, there was [at least a slim] nexus to the cell phone and iPad being involved in sending harassing letters. United States v. Goodman, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Nexus shown to cell phone in harassing letters case

N.D.Ga.: 28-day delay in getting SW for phones wasn’t unreasonable here

Defendant was driving a car with a fraudulent VIN but claimed he knew nothing about that, having borrowed the car. Other things in the car added to probable cause to believe he was involved in frauds, and that ultimately led … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: 28-day delay in getting SW for phones wasn’t unreasonable here