Category Archives: Issue preclusion

FL1: Judge issuing SW not barred from presiding over trial

Reviewing search warrant applications is a core function of a judicial officer, and that does not qualify as an improper ex parte communication requiring the trial judge to recuse. Writ of prohibition denied. Adelson v. State, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on FL1: Judge issuing SW not barred from presiding over trial

W.D.Wash.: Corroborated anonymous tip was enough for probation search

An anonymous tip “here predicted Dodd would engage in future criminal activity and the tipster explained how they knew this information. Bullard then investigated these claims and learned new, non-public information that corroborated many of the allegations.” This was “reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Corroborated anonymous tip was enough for probation search

CA3: Nodding yes to a request to search was consent

Defendant’s nodding yes to a request to search was consent to search the car. The officers might have believed he didn’t have standing since he was a mere passenger at the time. He didn’t mention facts supporting standing until at … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Consent, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Nodding yes to a request to search was consent

E.D.Mo.: Carpenter does not protect ISP information

Carpenter creates no protection for ISP subscriber information. No Due Process rights were violated though a § 1509 summons. United States v. Meyrand, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84060 (E.D. Mo. May 2, 2025).* This court declined to abandon the automobile … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Carpenter does not protect ISP information

S.D.Cal.: Second look at computer for CP based on court order was reasonable and in good faith

Defendant’s computer was seized and searched for child pornography. After the initial warrant, the government applied for permission to reexamine the computer media. The second look was justified, and the good faith exception applies because it involves reliance on a … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Second look at computer for CP based on court order was reasonable and in good faith

W.D.La.: Product of uncharged search of house comes in under 404(b)

Defendant was indicted for possession of drugs in a storage unit, but drugs and cash were also found in his house. That can come in under 404(b). United States v. Harris, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75696 (W.D. La. Apr. 21, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Product of uncharged search of house comes in under 404(b)

S.D.N.Y.: SW affidavit differs from crime in indictment such that court grants Franks hearing

Because the affidavit for search warrant differs so much from the ultimate crime defendants were charged with, defendant at least gets a Franks hearing. There’s some suggestion of materiality, but that’s not decided yet. United States v. Peraire-Bueno, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: SW affidavit differs from crime in indictment such that court grants Franks hearing

CA6: Ptf’s § 1983 case over his traffic stop and tickets barred by Younger

Plaintiff was ticketed by officers of the Kirkland PD, one for having a fictitious license plate, and he sued in federal court claiming Fourth Amendment and right to travel violations and the city had no jurisdiction over him. Younger bars … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf’s § 1983 case over his traffic stop and tickets barred by Younger

D.N.J.: Boxing in def’s car was a seizure

“Law enforcement’s conduct here—boxing in Deas’ Kia, ordering both Defendants out of the car, and placing them in handcuffs—falls within the scope of a seizure.” It was with reasonable suspicion. Then a dog alerted, then they got a warrant. United … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Boxing in def’s car was a seizure

C.D.Cal.: Affidavit’s failure to mention state court suppressed the same search was material and reckless under Franks

The affiant’s failure to include that a state court suppressed the underlying search was material to probable cause in federal court. The state search was based on the probation search exception, but the target was off probation. “This omission created … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Affidavit’s failure to mention state court suppressed the same search was material and reckless under Franks

E.D.La.: Def’s presence at another SW execution admissible under 404(b)

Defendant’s presence at a drug house when another search warrant was served is admissible under 404(b). United States v. Holmes, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55926 (E.D. La. Mar. 26, 2025).* Defendant’s performance on SFSTs was probable cause for his arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Def’s presence at another SW execution admissible under 404(b)

D.Kan.: § 1983 complaint questions state conviction and is barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s 242 paragraph § 1983 complaint calls into question his criminal conviction, so it’s barred by Heck. Turner v. Kansas Court of Appeals, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55052 (D. Kan. Mar. 25, 2025).* “Here, Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment unlawful imprisonment and … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: § 1983 complaint questions state conviction and is barred by Heck

AK: Public court filings violate no REP

“Herndon’s argument that her rights under the Fourth Amendment were violated when the superior court ‘commingled [her] private filings making it public’ is without merit. Herndon has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information that she voluntarily submitted to the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Public court filings violate no REP

W.D.N.Y.: Just saying the Stone bar is “misplaced” isn’t an answer

“In his reply …, Petitioner asserts in conclusory fashion that Respondent’s application of Stone is ‘misplaced.’ … However, he fails to explain why this is so. Nor does he attempt to show that he did not have a ‘full and … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Just saying the Stone bar is “misplaced” isn’t an answer

WA: Officers didn’t have to check whether MJ grow was state licensed before they sought a SW

“We hold that when viewed together, the facts in the affidavit were sufficient to establish probable cause to search all four properties, regardless of the fact that the odor of marijuana was only detected at two of the properties. Further, … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on WA: Officers didn’t have to check whether MJ grow was state licensed before they sought a SW

W.D.Mo.: Prior ruling on motion to suppress before speedy trial dismissal was law of the case

Defendant lost a motion to suppress but won a speedy trial dismissal without prejudice. Reindicted, he filed another motion to suppress, but law of the case applies. United States v. Bell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41924 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 7, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Prior ruling on motion to suppress before speedy trial dismissal was law of the case

CA10: Def’s “self-search” of his bag was consensual

At the Albuquerque Greyhound stop, defendant encountered DEA officers on the bus and ultimately opened his own bag and showed the contents. This “self-search” was consensual, and he was told he had a right to refuse. United States v. Jackson, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s “self-search” of his bag was consensual

CA8: Walkway to front door where mailbox was wasn’t protected curtilage

Defendant’s front yard wasn’t curtilage where there was a walkway to the mailbox by the door. Blood spatter was visible. The officers then went through a fence based on exigency. The observations supported a warrant. United States v. McGhee, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA8: Walkway to front door where mailbox was wasn’t protected curtilage

OR: Cell phone warrant was sufficiently particular to prevent a general rummaging

For this cell phone search, “As explained above, however, the first and fourth search categories are sufficiently specific, and defendant conceded below that the third category is sufficiently specific. Further, the sixth category’s command to search for location information—as circumscribed … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Particularity | Comments Off on OR: Cell phone warrant was sufficiently particular to prevent a general rummaging

W.D.Ky.: Police battering ram to door and shots fired inside is a seizure

In the Brianna Taylor civil rights prosecution, the battering ram to the door of the apartment with shots being fired was a seizure of the occupants. United States v. Hankison, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29347 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 19, 2025).* … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Seizure, Standing, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Police battering ram to door and shots fired inside is a seizure