FL1: Judge issuing SW not barred from presiding over trial

Reviewing search warrant applications is a core function of a judicial officer, and that does not qualify as an improper ex parte communication requiring the trial judge to recuse. Writ of prohibition denied. Adelson v. State, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 3620 (Fla. 1st DCA May 9, 2025).

When the driver could not be identified, asking for his SSN was reasonable. So was asking the passengers for their names. United States v. Morgan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88170 (N.D. Ala. Apr. 1, 2025).

The dashcam didn’t show the failure to signal, but the camera was on the passenger side of the patrol car, and it had a different view from the driver. The officer’s testimony is credited. United States v. Vann, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 11318 (6th Cir. May 8, 2025).*

The record does not support an ineffective assistance of counsel claim against defense counsel on a suppression issue, and Stone bars any free standing Fourth Amendment claim on habeas. United States v. Grant, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89323 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 18, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.