WA: Officers didn’t have to check whether MJ grow was state licensed before they sought a SW

“We hold that when viewed together, the facts in the affidavit were sufficient to establish probable cause to search all four properties, regardless of the fact that the odor of marijuana was only detected at two of the properties. Further, we hold that the search warrant was valid even though the affidavit did not indicate whether the marijuana grow operations were legal and registered with the state.” State v. My Le, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 436 (Mar. 11, 2025).

Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim is barred by SOL. “In Mr. Topolski’s claim for violation of his right to privacy, he cites Article I, Section 7 of the Washington State Constitution in addition to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. … But ‘Washington law has no counterpart to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 … and Washington courts have rejected attempts to create a private right of action for damages under the Washington Constitution absent guidance from the legislature.’ … Because there is no private right of action for this claim, it too will be DISMISSED with prejudice.” Topolski v. Wash. State Dep’t of Licensing, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44011 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 11, 2025).*

Abandoning the ineffective assistance claims in CoA pleadings on appeal is waiver. United States v. Scott, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5652 (5th Cir. Mar. 10, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.