W.D.Ky.: Police battering ram to door and shots fired inside is a seizure

In the Brianna Taylor civil rights prosecution, the battering ram to the door of the apartment with shots being fired was a seizure of the occupants. United States v. Hankison, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29347 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 19, 2025).*

Defendant didn’t get to see all the redacted warrant affidavit because it named the CI. On the whole it showed probable cause. People v. Etienne, 2025 NY Slip Op 00979 (2d Dept. Feb. 19, 2025).*

Defendant had standing to challenge a tracking order on a vehicle he’d been driving, didn’t own, and parked it and another drove off. Under Byrd, one doesn’t have to own a vehicle to have standing. As to the tracking order, it was issued with probable cause. As to defendant’s cell phone, it was seized with exigency and put into airplane mode. He conflates seizure and search of the phone needing a warrant. United States v. Hutchins, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28949 (W.D. Ky. Jan. 27, 2025).*

Petitioner’s Franks 2255 claim fails because it was already litigated. United States v. Aviles, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28912 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 19, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Seizure, Standing, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.