Author Archives: Hall

S.D.Ga.: USMJ recommends suppression of search after dog alert because dog prompted and window entered

USMJ recommends motion to suppress car search based on a dog alert should be granted because the handler prompted the dog and both the handler and dog entered the window and then the car before the dog alert. As to … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: USMJ recommends suppression of search after dog alert because dog prompted and window entered

S.D.N.Y.: Home confinement for pretrial release is not a 4A seizure

“In sum, defendant is not entitled to credit against his sentence for time spent under home confinement as a condition of his bail release. Further, defendant’s time spent on home confinement did not constitute a seizure of his person under … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Home confinement for pretrial release is not a 4A seizure

W.D.Va.: No REP prison visit with nonlawyer wouldn’t be videorecorded on bodycam

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his prison visit with his brother being recorded on body camera of a nearby correctional officer. Saunders v. Vilbrandt, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 989 (W.D. Va. Jan. 2, 2025).* “To the extent … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Video surveillance | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: No REP prison visit with nonlawyer wouldn’t be videorecorded on bodycam

LA Times: Is your car spying on you? What it means that Tesla shared data in the Las Vegas explosion

LA Times: Is your car spying on you? What it means that Tesla shared data in the Las Vegas explosion by Bernard Condon (“Your car is spying on you. [¶] That is one takeaway from the fast, detailed data that … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology, Video surveillance | Comments Off on LA Times: Is your car spying on you? What it means that Tesla shared data in the Las Vegas explosion

N.D.Ind.: Criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment

A criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment. United States v. Sole, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 908 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2025).* Defendant’s stop for clearly overtinted windows was reasonable. Disagreement by witnesses over minor details didn’t matter. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment

LR Article: Back to the Future: Revisiting State Constitutions to Protect Against New Technological Intrusions

Matthew Radford, Back to the Future: Revisiting State Constitutions to Protect Against New Technological Intrusions, 81 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1641 (2024). Abstract:

Posted in geofence, Pole cameras, State constitution, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on LR Article: Back to the Future: Revisiting State Constitutions to Protect Against New Technological Intrusions

NJ: Search not suppressed because bodycam wasn’t turned on

New Jersey has a bodycam directive that was apparently violated by the officers not turning theirs on before a search. Failure to turn on the bodycams was not a constitutional violation, and the court refuses to suppress. In addition, “the … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NJ: Search not suppressed because bodycam wasn’t turned on

OR: REP in cell phone lost when it was loaned to another

Defendant waived any reasonable expectation of privacy in this smartphone by loaning it to another [even under Oregon’s more stringent abandonment standards]. Here, it was completely out of his control because he loaned it to a young woman, and her … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: REP in cell phone lost when it was loaned to another

N.D.Miss.: ER staff’s search of def’s clothes was private search

Defendant was taken to the ER for gunshot wounds. The hospital staff took his clothes and looked in his pockets and then turned them over to the police. This was a private search. United States v. Coleman, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Private search | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: ER staff’s search of def’s clothes was private search

D.P.R.: Honest mistake in affidavit attempted to be corrected but no Franks violation here

The search warrant was in the S.D. Tex., and the affiant found a mistake before it was finalized that he communicated to the AUSAs involved. The correction, however, wasn’t made before he signed it, and he didn’t notice it. When … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Honest mistake in affidavit attempted to be corrected but no Franks violation here

ALPR in action

No law; license plate reader and video showed owner of car not driving: “Detective Smith also obtained footage from the Chevron across the street from Danny & Clyde’s, which allowed him to get a better look at the license plate … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on ALPR in action

M.D.Pa.: Despite state MMJ, smell of MJ still PC under federal law

Despite medical marijuana being legal in this state, the smell of marijuana from a car is still probable cause under federal law. United States v. Skouras, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 2, 2025):

Posted in Conflict of laws, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Despite state MMJ, smell of MJ still PC under federal law

PA: Arrest on a warrant requires the warrant be proved to exist

When an arrest warrant is served, it disappears from the system. Its existence can still be proved by someone with knowledge, but here it wasn’t. Therefore, the fruits of the arrest are suppressed for lack of proof of a valid … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on PA: Arrest on a warrant requires the warrant be proved to exist

D.Minn.: Disavowing ownership of the thing seized means no standing

“Here, Jackson appears to have denied any possessory interest in the SUV and the backpack. (Dkt. 22 ¶ 7 (‘Jackson was not the registered owner of the vehicle. He further claims all of the items in the vehicle and the … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Disavowing ownership of the thing seized means no standing

M.D.Ga.: Riverside/Gerstein violation doesn’t justify suppression of evidence seized on arrest

A Riverside/Gerstein violation of not timely presenting probable cause to a magistrate doesn’t justify suppressing the evidence from the arrest. United States v. Jackson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234511 (M.D. Ga. Dec. 31, 2024):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Search incident | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: Riverside/Gerstein violation doesn’t justify suppression of evidence seized on arrest

Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally

Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally by Henry Cesar (“Imagine getting pulled over for a broken taillight. The cop checks your license, hands you a ticket, and starts to … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally

N.D.Okla.: Flashing a fake badge in public doesn’t support SW for house

Defendant was indicted for impersonating an officer and flashing a fake badge at a school pickup line. The search warrant for his house for more evidence of that is suppressed. No nexus is ever shown between that offense and his … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Flashing a fake badge in public doesn’t support SW for house

W.D.N.Y.: Incorrect AUSA assertion about which phone was searched had to be promptly clarified, not when he or she felt like it

Here, the AUSA was apparently confused in pleadings as to which cell phone was searched, a white or black one. When the AUSA learned that the wrong one was spoken of, he or she had a duty to promptly clarify–not … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Incorrect AUSA assertion about which phone was searched had to be promptly clarified, not when he or she felt like it

E.D.Mo.: Even though threatened with obstruction if he didn’t, defendant consented to seizure of cell phone

The officer had probable cause to believe defendant took a video of a young girl in his house in the bathtub. Defendant was persuaded to turn over the phone and it was consensual. He was told that he might be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Voluntariness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Even though threatened with obstruction if he didn’t, defendant consented to seizure of cell phone

E.D.Ky.: § 1983 complaint against his state case is barred by Younger

Plaintiff’s § 1983 complaint against his state case is barred by Younger. Cuffee v. Cabuay, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 233153 (E.D. Ky. Dec. 27, 2024).* Defendant has no standing to challenge the search of another person’s cell phone. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: § 1983 complaint against his state case is barred by Younger