M.D.Pa.: Despite state MMJ, smell of MJ still PC under federal law

Despite medical marijuana being legal in this state, the smell of marijuana from a car is still probable cause under federal law. United States v. Skouras, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 2, 2025):

Whether a search is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a question of federal law that does not depend “on the law of the particular State in which the search occurs.” California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35, 43 (1988). And while Fourth Amendment analysis certainly depends on “our societal understanding” of privacy rights in relation to particular places or things, see Greenwood, 486 U.S. at 43 (emphasis in original) (citing Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 178; Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 143-44 & n.12 (1978), abrogated in part on other grounds by Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83 (1993)), state law plays an important role only to the extent that “the laws of all states” provide “the jurisprudential background informing past and contemporary notions of ‘reasonableness,'” see Christopher v. Nestlerode, 373 F. Supp. 2d 503, 514 (M.D. Pa. 2005) (Conner, J.) (emphasis in original) (citing, inter alia, Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318, 340-45 (2001)), aff’d, 240 F. App’x 481 (3d Cir. 2007). Skouras, however, does not mention state law other than Pennsylvania’s MMA in his motion or supporting papers. (See generally Doc. 40). Moreover, Skouras has not argued that the odors described in the affidavit of probable cause were not articulable or particularized as defined by our court of appeals’ binding precedents. (See generally id.) We conclude that the authorizing judge could properly rely on the smell-related allegations when assessing the existence of probable cause under the Fourth Amendment.

This entry was posted in Conflict of laws, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.