Author Archives: Hall

HPCWire: Do You Own Your Cloud Data? Third-Party Doctrine Says No

HPCWire: Do You Own Your Cloud Data? Third-Party Doctrine Says No by Alex Woodie (“Your data is yours, right? It seems like a simple question, but thanks to a little-known loophole in federal law, US regulators can access your private … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on HPCWire: Do You Own Your Cloud Data? Third-Party Doctrine Says No

IN: Stolen vehicles in yard doesn’t support SW for their records, and no GFE

Defendant was suspected of stealing trailers, and they were seen at his house. This did not justify a search warrant for documents in his house. In addition, the good faith exception did not apply. Thomas v. State, 2025 Ind. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Stolen vehicles in yard doesn’t support SW for their records, and no GFE

CA3: Nodding yes to a request to search was consent

Defendant’s nodding yes to a request to search was consent to search the car. The officers might have believed he didn’t have standing since he was a mere passenger at the time. He didn’t mention facts supporting standing until at … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Consent, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Nodding yes to a request to search was consent

W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a seizure

The use of stop sticks was a seizure, but here it was justified. United States v. Jordan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86127 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 4, 2025).* There was nexus for defendant’s place, and the Franks claim isn’t material. United … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force, Nexus, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a seizure

CA4: Where materiality fails under Franks, falsity doesn’t matter

The district court concluded that there was no false statement for Franks purposes, but that doesn’t even have to be decided. It certainly wasn’t material. Hedgepeth v. Nash Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 10868 (4th Cir. May 6, 2025).* It … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Where materiality fails under Franks, falsity doesn’t matter

ProPublica: The DEA Once Touted Body Cameras for Their “Enhanced Transparency.” Now the Agency Is Abandoning Them.

ProPublica: The DEA Once Touted Body Cameras for Their “Enhanced Transparency.” Now the Agency Is Abandoning Them. by Mario Ariza (“An internal email obtained by ProPublica said the agency made the change to be ‘consistent’ with a Trump executive order. … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on ProPublica: The DEA Once Touted Body Cameras for Their “Enhanced Transparency.” Now the Agency Is Abandoning Them.

CA1: Notable Bivens dismissal by its dissent: retired Justice Breyer

A Bivens claim, not specifically a Fourth Amendment claim, fails because of a different context from existing caselaw. The claim fails 2-1. What’s interesting is that retired Justice Breyer was on the panel, and he dissented that the claim should … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA1: Notable Bivens dismissal by its dissent: retired Justice Breyer

M.D.Fla.: Being made to leave during search of premises is not a seizure

Defendant was made to leave the premises while a search occurred inside, and that was not a seizure of his person. United States v. Arcadipane, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82688 (M.D. Fla. May 1, 2025). Defendant, a sex offender on … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Seizure, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Being made to leave during search of premises is not a seizure

DC: 2 am parking lot encounter was without RS

A radio dispatch of a suspicious vehicle on an apartment complex’s lot was so broad as to be meaningless. The trial court erred in relying on it. When the officer pulled up on the car, two occupants in the back … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: 2 am parking lot encounter was without RS

IL: Paperwork discrepancies permitted a truck safety inspection

Continuation of a commercial moving truck stop for a safety inspection was reasonable after there were “paperwork discrepancies.” People v. Ivanchuk, 2025 IL App (4th) 241230, 2025 Ill. App. LEXIS 856 (May 1, 2025). Mere negligent omissions for a Franks … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Privileges | Comments Off on IL: Paperwork discrepancies permitted a truck safety inspection

AF: Military search authorization orally supplemented was subject to GFE

There were multiple military search authorizations, and the request here was orally supplemented before issuance expanding the particularity. Also, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Johnson, 2025 CCA LEXIS 193 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. May 2, 2025). A … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Seizure, Warrant papers, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on AF: Military search authorization orally supplemented was subject to GFE

D.Neb.: First time CI was corroborated

This first time CI, arrested the day before, was corroborated and there was probable cause. United States v. Schelling, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83754 (D. Neb. May 2, 2025).* There was reasonable suspicion with collective knowledge, and the search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: First time CI was corroborated

E.D.Mo.: Carpenter does not protect ISP information

Carpenter creates no protection for ISP subscriber information. No Due Process rights were violated though a § 1509 summons. United States v. Meyrand, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84060 (E.D. Mo. May 2, 2025).* This court declined to abandon the automobile … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Carpenter does not protect ISP information

N.D.Ala.: Lack of a SW signature cured by GFE

“Defendant argues that the warrant is facially deficient because the affidavit lacked a signature, a panel of the Eleventh Circuit has considered and rejected this argument. See United States v. Gordon, 686 F. App’x 702, 704 (11th Cir. 2017) (holding … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Forfeiture, Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Lack of a SW signature cured by GFE

W.D.N.Y.: SW application wasn’t defective because it used “reasonable cause” instead of “probable cause”

The search warrant application wasn’t defective because it used “reasonable cause” instead of “probable cause.” They are interchangeable. United States v. Tundo, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84283 (W.D.N.Y. May 2, 2025). Four months of pole camera surveillance on the front … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Pole cameras, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: SW application wasn’t defective because it used “reasonable cause” instead of “probable cause”

D.N.J.: Admin SW can’t be quashed before execution

The company here refused an OSHA administrative inspection, so OSHA got an administrative warrant. Then the company moved to quash. Citing In re Anthony Marano Company, 556 F. Supp. 3d 890 (N.D. Ill. 2021), the court holds there is no … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Motion to suppress, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Admin SW can’t be quashed before execution

CA4 (en banc): Geofence warrant was in good faith; no decision on merits

The Fourth Circuit dodges deciding the merits of geofence warrants by going with good faith in a per curiam virtually summary affirmance with 124 pages of concurring and dissenting opinions. Having heard the excellent, spirited oral argument, this was where … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4 (en banc): Geofence warrant was in good faith; no decision on merits

NYT: Judge Temporarily Blocks Border Patrol’s Stop-and-Arrest Tactics in California

NYT: Judge Temporarily Blocks Border Patrol’s Stop-and-Arrest Tactics in California by Kate Selig (“Border Patrol agents carried out sweeps in California’s Central Valley. Lawyers argued that people were stopped and arrested based on their skin color.”)

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on NYT: Judge Temporarily Blocks Border Patrol’s Stop-and-Arrest Tactics in California

techpolicy: Reverse Keyword Search Warrants and the Threat to Online Privacy

techpolicy: Reverse Keyword Search Warrants and the Threat to Online Privacy by Abigail Zislis (“Online privacy rights, already limited in the United States, face new threats from the advent of reverse keyword search warrants. In recent years, local and federal … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on techpolicy: Reverse Keyword Search Warrants and the Threat to Online Privacy

MA: Extraterritorial citizen’s arrest power doesn’t permit seizures of cell phone and removal back home

Officers went to New Hampshire on a criminal investigation for a Massachusetts crime, and they ended up seizing defendant’s cell phone to preserve evidence, bringing it back to Massachusetts where it was searched. The common law power of citizen’s arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Common law, Conflict of laws, Particularity | Comments Off on MA: Extraterritorial citizen’s arrest power doesn’t permit seizures of cell phone and removal back home