Author Archives: Hall

WaPo: Families of men killed in boat strikes sue Trump administration

WaPo: Families of men killed in boat strikes sue Trump administration by Mariana Alfaro & Dan Lamothe (“The families of two Trinidadian men killed in October during a U.S. strike on boats off the coast of Venezuela filed a wrongful-death … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, National security | Comments Off on WaPo: Families of men killed in boat strikes sue Trump administration

VA: Exclusionary rule does not apply in animal cruelty forfeitures

The exclusionary rule does not apply in animal cruelty forfeitures, distinguishing One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania. Mogensen v. Cty. of Rockbridge, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 46 (Jan. 27, 2026). Defendant’s stop for a broken taillight lacked reasonable suspicion because … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: Exclusionary rule does not apply in animal cruelty forfeitures

D.Minn.: The stated reason for the stop was pretextual, but it was with PC

There was probable cause for the stop and search of defendant’s car before the pretextual stop. Therefore, it was all valid. United States v. Nieves, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 272309 (D. Minn. Dec. 1, 2025).* Defendant’s stop was with reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The stated reason for the stop was pretextual, but it was with PC

IL: Failure to conduct a preliminary hearing for PC mooted by conviction

Failure to conduct a preliminary hearing to establish probable cause is mooted by defendant’s conviction after trial. People v. Chambliss, 2026 IL 130585, 2025 Ill. LEXIS 7 (Jan. 23, 2026). “Lucas claims that Rubenstahl violated her Fourth Amendment right to … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on IL: Failure to conduct a preliminary hearing for PC mooted by conviction

N.D.N.Y.: Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure

Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure. Keith v. Romain, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13105 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2026). Police responded to a bar on a ShotSpotter report, but it was for naught. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure

WaPo: How officers used new ICE memo to forcefully enter a Minneapolis home

WaPo: How officers used new ICE memo to forcefully enter a Minneapolis home by Arelis R. Hernández (“With long guns pointed in her direction, Teyana Gibson repeatedly demanded that federal immigration officers show her a warrant as she stood between … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: How officers used new ICE memo to forcefully enter a Minneapolis home

Reason: ICE Tells Legal Observer, ‘We Have a Nice Little Database, and Now You’re Considered a Domestic Terrorist’

Reason: ICE Tells Legal Observer, ‘We Have a Nice Little Database, and Now You’re Considered a Domestic Terrorist’ by C.J. Ciaramella (“Video taken this [Friday] in Maine shows an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer taking pictures of a legal … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Reason: ICE Tells Legal Observer, ‘We Have a Nice Little Database, and Now You’re Considered a Domestic Terrorist’

KS: Geofence warrant valid under GFE

This geofence warrant was valid by the good faith exception. State v. Mitchell-Pennington, 2026 Kan. App. LEXIS 6 (Jan. 23, 2026). The omitted facts merely clarified, not defeated, probable cause. The motion to suppress was properly denied. Urrutia v. State, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Consent, Franks doctrine, geofence, Good faith exception | Comments Off on KS: Geofence warrant valid under GFE

E.D.Pa.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to grand jury evidence

Under Calandra (1974), there’s no basis for dismissing an indictment because it might be based on an illegal search. The search was valid anyway because it was based on the consenter’s apparent authority. United States v. Jones, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Immigration arrests, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to grand jury evidence

SC: DNA taken on 2007 arrest didn’t need to be suppressed because he was acquitted back then

Defendant’s DNA was taken when he was charged in 2007 and later acquitted. The DNA sample should not be suppressed because it was lawfully taken at the time. State v. Harrington, 2026 S.C. App. LEXIS 7 (Jan. 21, 2026). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on SC: DNA taken on 2007 arrest didn’t need to be suppressed because he was acquitted back then

WaPo: As ICE arrests surged, Trump administration sought to cut bodycam program

WaPo: As ICE arrests surged, Trump administration sought to cut bodycam program by Maria Sacchetti (“A string of violent incidents has added fresh urgency to calls for more body-worn cameras. But DHS proposed reducing spending on them in its initial … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on WaPo: As ICE arrests surged, Trump administration sought to cut bodycam program

DC: Detention at park for talking to another person was without RS

Defendant was at a park with his child and he saw someone he knew who he went to and talked to. Police started coming for the other person, so he left him and went back to his child. Then two … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: Detention at park for talking to another person was without RS

S.D.N.Y.: Email SW with “practical accuracy” particular enough

Email warrant was particular enough with “practical accuracy”: “But the Second Circuit has upheld the validity of warrants without the presence of exacting, rigid limitations, noting that the focus is ‘on practical accuracy, as opposed to technical precision.’ United States … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Email SW with “practical accuracy” particular enough

CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies

Defendant’s pants were transported from the hospital to the jail, and inevitable discovery covers their search. United States v. Gibbins, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432 (4th Cir. Jan. 21, 2026). The warrant for five cell phones was executed within the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inevitable discovery, Prison and jail searches, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies

D.Md.: AG’s admin. investigative demand for improper purpose and quashed; constitutional right of privacy in medical records

The AG issued a subpoena to a hospital for records of adolescent gender affirming care. The subpoena is quashed. The subject has Art. III standing. There is no allegation of a health care offense to support the subpoena. In addition, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Md.: AG’s admin. investigative demand for improper purpose and quashed; constitutional right of privacy in medical records

MS.now: Federal immigration agents keep shooting at drivers. We tracked 15 cases since July.

MS.now: Federal immigration agents keep shooting at drivers. We tracked 15 cases since July. By David Noriega & Kay Guerrero (“After each shooting, federal agencies claimed the drivers tried to ram agents with their vehicles. But the claim often falls … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on MS.now: Federal immigration agents keep shooting at drivers. We tracked 15 cases since July.

GA: Cell phone dropped in flight from police was abandoned

Defendant abandoned the cell phone he dropped in flight from the police which he failed to return for. Franklin v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 20 (Jan. 21, 2026).* Defendant filed his first post-conviction claim not mentioning ineffective assistance for not … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Cell phone dropped in flight from police was abandoned

CA7: Stop at night in a high crime area and furtive movements justified protective sweep of car

Defendant was stopped in a high crime area at night, and his furtive movements in the car justified a protective sweep of the car. United States v. Erving, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 1377 (7th Cir. Jan. 20, 2026).* Defendant’s car … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Stop at night in a high crime area and furtive movements justified protective sweep of car

C.D.Cal.: DHS’s motion for summary judgment denied; L.A. Press Club states cause of action for excessive force against press

The L.A. Press Club’s suit against DHS for excessive force against the press corps can proceed and summary judgment for the defense is denied. “The Court rejects Defendants’ standing and First Amendment arguments for reasons similar to those already articulated … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: DHS’s motion for summary judgment denied; L.A. Press Club states cause of action for excessive force against press

AP: Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge’s warrant, memo says

AP: Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge’s warrant, memo says by Rebecca Santana: Federal immigration officers are asserting sweeping power to forcibly enter people’s homes without a judge’s warrant, according to an internal Immigration and … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on AP: Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge’s warrant, memo says