GA: Cell phone dropped in flight from police was abandoned

Defendant abandoned the cell phone he dropped in flight from the police which he failed to return for. Franklin v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 20 (Jan. 21, 2026).*

Defendant filed his first post-conviction claim not mentioning ineffective assistance for not pursuing a motion to suppress. Then he filed another that did. It was barred. He also claimed it violated F.R.Crim.P. 41 which is irrelevant in state court. Also, defense counsel was alleged to be ineffective for not challenging the warrant because the affiant officer was convicted of conspiracy to distribute fentanyl years later. State v. Michie, 2026-Ohio-163 (10th Dist. Jan. 20, 2026).*

“Mr. Rodriguez argues that merely being seen with or associating with a suspected criminal does not subject a person to a lawful stop and warrantless search. … However, even if the officers’ reasonable, articulable suspicion of Mr. Rodriguez’s criminal activity were insufficient alone, his driving/vehicle infractions provided lawful bases for the investigatory stop.” United States v. Rodriguez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9795 (D. Minn. Jan. 20, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.