Author Archives: Hall

N.D.N.Y.: Def’s immigration arrest was unreasonable and the product is suppressed

Defendant’s immigration arrest was unreasonable and the product is suppressed. United States v. Juarez-Lopez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 269401 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 18, 2025)*:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Def’s immigration arrest was unreasonable and the product is suppressed

D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

Plaintiff’s claim unauthorized officers executed the search warrant under state law isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. Richard v. Jeffcoat, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1512 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2026). Based on the search warrant, “The government may not disclose [at trial] … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Custody, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

WI: Interlock device from 2008 BAC refusal proper civil penalty

Refusal of a BAC can legitimately have civil consequences without violating the Fourth Amendment per Birchfield. Here it was a 2008 refusal that led to an interlock in 2013 that was recently violated. State v. Sparby-Duncan, 2026 Wisc. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Drug or alcohol testing, Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on WI: Interlock device from 2008 BAC refusal proper civil penalty

CA9: In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable

In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable and “not excessively intrusive.” McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High Sch. Dist., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 172 (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026). “Valdivia counters that [the officer’s] … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on CA9: In school seizure of plaintiff’s cell phone for 30 minutes was not unreasonable

CA10: A search incident to arrest isn’t valid when there’s no arrest

A search incident to arrest isn’t valid when there’s no arrest. The law is clearly established, so no qualified immunity. Montgomery v. Cruz, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 161 (10th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026). The defense succeeded in a Franks challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on CA10: A search incident to arrest isn’t valid when there’s no arrest

S.D.Cal.: Notebook of passwords was within the scope of a CSAM warrant

During a child pornography warranted search, officers found a notebook of passwords, and it was within the scope of the warrant. United States v. Lira-Prado, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 982 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). One child pornography warrant led … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Overbreadth, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Notebook of passwords was within the scope of a CSAM warrant

E.D.Mich.: Defense can’t use SCA to get emails, even if they’re exculpatory

Only a governmental entity gets to use the Stored Communications Act to get emails. The defense can’t do it seeking even alleged exculpatory emails. Perry v. Silverthon, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 828 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 5, 2026). “Single-incident liability ‘is … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Overbreadth, Particularity, Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Defense can’t use SCA to get emails, even if they’re exculpatory

Sixth edition arrived today

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Sixth edition arrived today

S.D.N.Y.: Investigative medical exams implicate 4A

“The Fourth Amendment is implicated when medical examinations are undertaken at the initiative of a state official for an investigatory purpose. See Tenenbaum v. Williams, 193 F.3d 581, 606 (2d Cir. 1999) (holding that the Fourth Amendment applies to ‘searches … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Investigative medical exams implicate 4A

OH5: Ohio recognizes Groh incorporation by reference for particularity

Ohio recognizes Groh incorporation by reference for particularity. State v. Starcher, 2026-Ohio-15, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 11 (5th Dist. Jan. 6, 2026). In a civil case, the reference to Fourth Amendment was a typo for Fourteenth. It will be considered … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity | Comments Off on OH5: Ohio recognizes Groh incorporation by reference for particularity

D.N.J.: Someone doesn’t have to be home to execute a SW

It isn’t a proper Fourth Amendment challenge for a warrant not to be executed because no one is home. Rodriguez-Ferreira v. Sweeney, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 560 (D.N.J. Jan. 5, 2026). Defense counsel objected to the search warrant twice on … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Someone doesn’t have to be home to execute a SW

WSJ: How Judges Are Using AI to Help Decide Your Legal Dispute

WSJ: How Judges Are Using AI to Help Decide Your Legal Dispute by Erin Mulvaney (“The technology is helping summarize legal filings, prepare for hearings and map out decisions”):

Posted in AI | Comments Off on WSJ: How Judges Are Using AI to Help Decide Your Legal Dispute

TN: Not objecting to SW affidavit at trial here not IAC; it fit defense theory

Defense counsel didn’t object to the search warrant and application coming into evidence in the state’s case because it fit within the defense theory, despite being full of hearsay, assuming defendant would testify, as he said he would. Then he … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on TN: Not objecting to SW affidavit at trial here not IAC; it fit defense theory

D.Mass.: Five prior surveilled deliveries led to anticipatory warrant

Five packages from Puerto Rico arrived at defendant’s apartment building for fictitious tenants in 303 and 404. After they were left in the alcove, defendant was seen to remove them to his apartment, 901. The sixth package had a positive … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Anticipatory warrant | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Five prior surveilled deliveries led to anticipatory warrant

CA7: 911 call about DV in progress in house was exigency for entry

“Here we conclude that, based on the undisputed facts, the officers had an objectively reasonable basis to believe that someone in Cannon’s home needed immediate aid and that there was a compelling need to enter without a warrant. The officers … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA7: 911 call about DV in progress in house was exigency for entry

WaPo: U.S. capture of Maduro may be illegal; that likely won’t matter in court

WaPo: U.S. capture of Maduro may be illegal; that likely won’t matter in court by Perry Steinand Shayna Jacobs:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: U.S. capture of Maduro may be illegal; that likely won’t matter in court

CA10: Nexus subject to GFE

The charge was impersonating an FBI agent at a school student pickup line. A warrant was issued for defendant’s house and computers to see if he bought faux FBI paraphernalia online.* The district court suppressed for lack of nexus. Reversed; … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA10: Nexus subject to GFE

MA: Facebook selfie supported SW for def’s cell phone

A Facebook photo that appeared to be a selfie on defendant’s Facebook account wearing the shirt witnesses to the shooting describe supported a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone. Commonwealth v. Carleton, 2026 Mass. LEXIS 1 (Jan. 5, 2026). Plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones | Comments Off on MA: Facebook selfie supported SW for def’s cell phone

CA6: 4A doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness

A three-week-old controlled buy was part of the probable cause. The Fourth Amendment doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness. Nexus was clear: “The nexus in this case, by contrast, left nothing to the imagination.” Police used pole camera surveillance … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: 4A doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness

D.N.H.: Late disclosed SW application doesn’t show “actual innocence”; “legal innocence” is different

Petitioner obtained his search warrant application years after he was convicted. His habeas is denied. He claims it shows he was actually innocent, but this is only potential legal innocence, not actual innocence, and there’s a difference. Davis v. Warden, … Continue reading

Posted in Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Late disclosed SW application doesn’t show “actual innocence”; “legal innocence” is different