CA8: Police with arrest warrant could enter third-party premises to arrest defendant

Police with a warrant for defendant could enter a third party’s premises to arrest him on probable cause that he was present. Under Steagald, defendant had no more reasonable expectation of privacy in the third party’s premises than the owner or prime resident would. United States v. Butler, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6663 (8th Cir. Mar. 6, 2026).

Plaintiff gets summary judgment on an unlawful entry into his curtilage to arrest him without a warrant. It was clearly established that a warrant was required, but for exigent circumstances, and the defense justifications for that are lacking. Moore v. Finley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45460 (N.D. Ala. Mar. 5, 2026).*

Defendant’s new habeas claim that the USMJ violated his judicial role in an NIT/Playpen warrant nine years ago is a successive petition. The Fourth Amendment claim was litigated long ago. United States v. Jones, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45444 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.