CA6: PO’s information that def was probably at a house was enough to arrest him there on a warrant

Information from his PO justified defendant’s arrest on a warrant at his brother’s place. He’d been arrested there before, and he was seen there. Officers did not need to exclude other possible places he should have been first. United States v. Martinez-Hipolito, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6785 (6th Cir. Mar. 5, 2026).

There was probable cause for search of defendant’s cell phone based on information child pornography was coming from it. United States v. Day, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6788 (6th Cir. Mar. 5, 2026).*

Defendant gets his cell phone and wallet back because the government has no need to keep them for evidence. United States v. Arrington, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46958 (D. Idaho Mar. 5, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.