Category Archives: E-mail

D.Idaho: Broad email warrants are not per se unreasonable

Broad email search warrants were not unreasonable just because they were broad. The breadth of the financial crime under investigation justifies it. In addition, the good faith exception applies and it’s too early to tell if any has to be … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Broad email warrants are not per se unreasonable

D.Ariz.: Overseizure of emails by SW didn’t require suppression of all; GFE also applies

This search warrant was issued in a SSA fraud case alleging a decade of false claims. The search warrant was sufficiently particular and not overbroad. The fact the period of the alleged offense was through January 2014 did not prohibit … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Overseizure | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Overseizure of emails by SW didn’t require suppression of all; GFE also applies

E.D.Wash.: Seizure of e-mails between def and lawyer prior to adversary proceedings didn’t violate 6A

The seizure of defendant’s emails between him and his lawyer didn’t violate the Sixth Amendment when adversary proceedings had not yet begun – defendant wasn’t indicted for more than a year later. United States v. Smith, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Privileges | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: Seizure of e-mails between def and lawyer prior to adversary proceedings didn’t violate 6A

S.D.N.Y.: Govt satisfied § 2705(b) nondisclosure requirements; NDO didn’t violate 1A

The government showed a justifiable basis for a nondisclosure order (NDO) under 18 U.S.C. § 2705(b) of the order directed to Google for six email accounts. Assuming strict scrutiny applied, the government showed it because nondisclosure could prevent compromising an … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Govt satisfied § 2705(b) nondisclosure requirements; NDO didn’t violate 1A

CA1: Alleged overseizure of email under SW would only require partial suppression; def doesn’t identify that which was overseized

Defendant’s motion to suppress electronic data acquired by a Rule 41(e)(2)(B) search warrant on his email account was properly denied. Based on the absence of a time limit in the warrant, it was not unreasonable to interpret the warrant to … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Overseizure, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: Alleged overseizure of email under SW would only require partial suppression; def doesn’t identify that which was overseized

E.D.Mich.: No ex ante opportunity for email account holder to challenge SW

Targets of an email search warrant lack standing to challenge the search warrant ex ante, before execution. They must do so after. In the Matter of the Search of Records, Information, and Data Associated with 14 Email Addresses Controlled by … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No ex ante opportunity for email account holder to challenge SW

Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails

Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails by RJ Vogt:

Posted in E-mail, Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails

Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails

Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails by RJ Vogt:

Posted in E-mail, Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on Law360: Lawmakers Push To Extend Atty-Client Shield To Prison Emails

S.D.N.Y.: Typo in SW for emails could be overlooked in “common sense,” nontechnical reading

There was a typo in the affidavit for search warrant for emails, and the government procured another. The typo wasn’t even material because a “common sense” reading of the whole affidavit shows it was typographical error that could be overcome. … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Typo in SW for emails could be overlooked in “common sense,” nontechnical reading

The Federalist: The Feds Don’t Need To Tell You Or Get A Warrant To Collect Your Emails And Phone Records

The Federalist: The Feds Don’t Need To Tell You Or Get A Warrant To Collect Your Emails And Phone Records by Leslie McAdoo Gordon.

Posted in Cell phones, E-mail | Comments Off on The Federalist: The Feds Don’t Need To Tell You Or Get A Warrant To Collect Your Emails And Phone Records

E.D.N.Y.: Email SWs are treated the same as hard drive warrants: The entirety may be seized so it can be searched by keyword

Email search warrants are treated the same as hard drive warrants: The entirety may be seized so it can be searched by keyword to find relevant material. Moreover, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Chalavoutis, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Email SWs are treated the same as hard drive warrants: The entirety may be seized so it can be searched by keyword

D.Ore.: No REP in a govt computer and email where there were banner warnings at every sign in

Defendant’s government work emails were searched without a warrant, and it’s clear, based on warnings on the computer at every sign in and regular training, that he was well aware everything on the computer has no reasonable expectation of privacy. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, E-mail, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Ore.: No REP in a govt computer and email where there were banner warnings at every sign in

D.Idaho: Failure to tell USMJ that a trash pull came up empty wasn’t material when there was more that did show PC; wouldn’t have changed outcome

Omission to tell the USMJ that a trash search of defendant’s house came up empty didn’t undermine the other probable cause, wouldn’t have changed the outcome, and wasn’t a Franks issue. The same here about defendant’s alleged travels: Omissions don’t … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Failure to tell USMJ that a trash pull came up empty wasn’t material when there was more that did show PC; wouldn’t have changed outcome

D.Nev.: Email SW limited to a date range and containing keywords was particular

Email search warrant limited to a date range and containing keywords was particular. United States v. Cariani, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177059 (D. Nev. Oct. 10, 2019):

Posted in E-mail, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Email SW limited to a date range and containing keywords was particular

WaPo: DEA, IRS reviewed cache of emails amid ongoing criminal probe into Baltimore lawyers

WaPo: DEA, IRS reviewed cache of emails amid ongoing criminal probe into Baltimore lawyers by Tim Prudente:

Posted in E-mail, Privileges | Comments Off on WaPo: DEA, IRS reviewed cache of emails amid ongoing criminal probe into Baltimore lawyers

N.D.Cal.: Yahoo!’s TOS results in no REP in CP transmitted through it

The Terms of Service of Yahoo! email provide defendant no reasonable expectation of privacy in child pornography that was transmitted by its service. In addition, Yahoo!’s search was a private search. United States v. Wolfenbarger, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148822 … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Yahoo!’s TOS results in no REP in CP transmitted through it