WV: Whether picking up firearm to note SN was search under Hicks is moot here

Creative argument but ultimately shortsighted: Is picking up a firearm to see the serial number was a search under Arizona v. Hicks? Except it’s completely harmless here. State v. Pinkerman, 2026 W. Va. LEXIS 453 (Oct. 29, 2026)* [After all, there’s the “public safety exception,” whatever that is.]:

The petitioner argues that when Cpl. Cremeans picked the 9mm Beretta up and turned it over to photograph its opposite side, he conducted a search under Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987), in which the Supreme Court held that moving an object to expose a concealed surface is a search distinct from the lawful objective that first brought the officer into contact with the object. However, in this case it is unnecessary for us to decide whether the handling and photographing of the 9mm Beretta was a search or seizure. The petitioner was not charged with or convicted of any offense relating to the 9mm Beretta the officers photographed. Rather, he was indicted on charges stemming from the use of a different firearm and his own overt actions.

Still, even assuming the manipulation of the 9mm Beretta was an unlawful search, suppression of the resulting photograph would not alter the outcome in this case. …

This entry was posted in Search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.