D.Md.: Claim for “constructive seizure” fails

Plaintiff doesn’t state a claim for a “constructive seizure” by telling someone else of a warrant being out. Gladden v. Bd. of Educ. of Harford Cty., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45075 (D. Md. Mar. 5, 2026).*

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim that defense counsel didn’t properly argue a Fourth Amendment claim is denied. Counsel succeeded in getting two phones suppressed. He’s not specific as to what else. United States v. Armstrong, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45127 (D. Minn. Mar. 5, 2026).*

Nexus was shown for search warrants for defendant’s email and social media accounts being somehow connected to the offense. United States v. Luthor, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45158 (D. Minn. Mar. 5, 2026).*

This entry was posted in E-mail, Ineffective assistance, Seizure, Social media warrants. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.