Pole cameras FYI

Out of curiosity, I did a Lexis search of pole cameras. They’ve shown in 30 opinions so far in 2025.

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on Pole cameras FYI

D.Alaska: Despite SW affidavit’s failures, search of car otherwise valid under automobile exception

The showing for the search warrant for defendant’s car and cell phone was completely deficient. As to the car, its search is sustained under the automobile exception instead, but the phone extraction is suppressed. United States v. Carlton, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70596 (D. Alaska Feb. 18, 2025) (R&R).

Stop for failure to signal at a Y intersection was not an reasonable interpretation of an otherwise ambiguous statute. State v. Moore, 2025-Ohio-1326 (5th Dist. Apr. 15, 2025).*

Defendant’s indictment came five years after the search. His motion to dismiss for preindictment delay is denied for lack of a showing of prejudice. United States v. Naser, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70674 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 14, 2025).*

Plaintiff’s car was repossessed by defendant. It’s not a government actor for the Fourth Amendment. Pinkston v. Advanced Fin. Servs., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70374 (D. Del. Apr. 14, 2025).*

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Despite SW affidavit’s failures, search of car otherwise valid under automobile exception

CA8: Dog’s instinctive head in the car window wasn’t a trespass

The dog touching the car was instinctive and not handler directed. Therefore, it’s not a trespass. There’s some doubt in the existing rule in this circuit, but not here. United States v. Munoz, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8808 (8th Cir. Apr. 15, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Dog sniff, Trespass | Comments Off on CA8: Dog’s instinctive head in the car window wasn’t a trespass

NYC Formal Opinion 2025-1: A government lawyer may refuse a superior’s order to lie in court.

NYC Bar Formal Opinion 2025-1: A government lawyer may refuse a superior’s order to lie in court.

“May” not “shall.” So, what about the ethical duty to report the superior for requesting the lie?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYC Formal Opinion 2025-1: A government lawyer may refuse a superior’s order to lie in court.

E.D.Wis.: Affidavit’s statement def was in surveillance video was reasonable and not reckless

Officer’s statement that defendant was in a surveillance video was a reasonable conclusion, and not a reckless overstatement for Franks. United States v. Warren, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70293 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 14, 2025).*

Defendant passed up a conditional plea and had a bench trial combined with suppression hearing. That also cost him acceptance of responsibility. United States v. Nunez, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8789 (5th Cir. Apr. 14, 2025).*

Officers reasonably believed that a hotel manager had authority to consent to search of a room that defendant was out of. United States v. Anderson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70108 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 14, 2025)* (“To be sure, Medina never expressly said she wanted Anderson ‘trespassed’ (to use the word Officer Granas employed to describe ejecting a hotel guest), or that she had ejected him. … But Fourth Amendment inquiries are grounded in reasonableness, not the intoning of ‘magic words.’ Fair v. Mills, 230 F. Supp. 3d 1305, 1311 (M.D. Fla. 2017) (quoting United States v. Gray, 369 F.3d 1024, 1026 (8th Cir. 2004)). The facts recited above gave Officer Granas a reasonable basis for believing that Medina had the authority to consent to the room’s search, regardless of the particular words Medina used.”).

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Affidavit’s statement def was in surveillance video was reasonable and not reckless

M.D.Ala.: When a car search is based on smell of MJ, it doesn’t matter that none was found

When a search is based on the smell of burnt or fresh marijuana, it doesn’t matter that none was found. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70597 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 13, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: When a car search is based on smell of MJ, it doesn’t matter that none was found

CO: PC a gun was in car permits search of trunk

Defendant was a suspect in a shooting incident. He was found outside a car. There was probable cause to believe the gun was inside the passenger compartment or trunk, even though the windows were down and the trunk closed when they saw him. Probable cause permits a search where the object might be. People v. Furness, 2025 CO 16, 2025 Colo. LEXIS 235 (Apr. 14, 2025).

Defendant discovered when in prison that the dash cam was omitted from inventory. That’s not going to make an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. “Accordingly, the failure to file a motion to suppress the dash cam evidence does not amount to ‘a reasonable probability the result of the trial would have been otherwise had the motion been granted’ as the testimony at trial supports Appellant’s conviction establishing that he did not act in self-defense when he shot and killed D.P. in the back.” State v. Morgan, 2025-Ohio-1312 (7th Dist. Apr. 7, 2025).*

The City of Lansing hired tree services to trim around power lines. There was no Fourth Amendment violation from their allegedly photographing plaintiff’s wife who came into her yard to yell at them about “what the hell they were doing.” She came out to into the yard on her own. Faraone v. Lansing Bd. of Water & Light, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 2821 (Apr. 11, 2025) (unpublished).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search | Comments Off on CO: PC a gun was in car permits search of trunk

CA4: No downward variance for 4A violation in revocation of supervised release

Defendant was on supervised release and revoked. No downward variance because the search violated the Fourth Amendment and led to dismissal of that separate case. United States v. Corbett, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8758 (4th Cir. Apr. 14, 2025).

“In this case, the district court reasoned that the 911 caller appeared to have a basis of knowledge because his report concerned an incident to which he was an eyewitness. See Navarette v. California, 572 U.S. 393, 399 (2014) … The district court also reasoned that the reliability of the caller’s report was enhanced because it was ‘at least minimally corroborated’ by the officers’ knowledge that Gaal was known by the nickname Deq and drove a red Toyota. … The district court concluded that the totality of the circumstances indicated a reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity sufficient to justify the officers’ seizure of Gaal.” The court agrees. State v. Gaal, 2025 Minn. App. LEXIS 108 (Apr. 14, 2025).*

Special supervised release condition of electronic monitoring was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Robinson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8718 (2d Cir. Apr. 14, 2025).*

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: No downward variance for 4A violation in revocation of supervised release

Bloomberg Law: Bootleggers, Cops, and Cars: How Driving Became a Privacy Trap

Bloomberg Law: Bootleggers, Cops, and Cars: How Driving Became a Privacy Trap by Cassandre Coyer, Tonya Riley & Jorja Siemons about automatic license plate readers in Norfolk VA.

A subheading: “Data a Modern Car Can Collect”:

Continue reading
Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: Bootleggers, Cops, and Cars: How Driving Became a Privacy Trap

NYTimes: This Company’s Surveillance Tech Makes Immigrants ‘Easy Pickings’ for Trump

NYTimes: This Company’s Surveillance Tech Makes Immigrants ‘Easy Pickings’ for Trump By Paul Mozyr, Adam Satariano & Aaron Krolik (“Geo Group, a private prison firm that makes digital tools to track immigrants, becomes one of the Trump administration’s big business winners as its tech is increasingly used in deportations.”)

Posted in Immigration arrests, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: This Company’s Surveillance Tech Makes Immigrants ‘Easy Pickings’ for Trump

CalMatters: Border Patrol to retrain hundreds of California agents on how to comply with Constitution

CalMatters: Border Patrol to retrain hundreds of California agents on how to comply with Constitution by Wendy Fry and Sergio Olmos.

Oh? They are the best source?

Update: Then this Sunday: San Diego Post: California immigration raids slammed as racial profiling—now DHS admits training failure by Jacob Shelton (“The U.S. Department of Homeland Security will retrain more than 900 Border Patrol agents in California following backlash over controversial immigration sweeps earlier this year in Kern County. The move comes in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which alleges that the raids violated constitutional protections against arbitrary arrest.”)

Posted in Border search, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CalMatters: Border Patrol to retrain hundreds of California agents on how to comply with Constitution

E.D.Wis.: PC was shown for a warrant for five cell phones for use in trafficking drugs

Probable cause was shown for a warrant for five cell phones for use in trafficking drugs. “The presence of the phones near drugs also gave rise to an inference that any phones associated with the defendant (in cars he drove or in his residence) would contain evidence of drug dealing. The court already has explained that the drugs were packaged in two, sandwich-sized baggies, each containing several smaller, separately wrapped parcels and all within feet of two firearms. The phones officers observed were together and immediately next to the drugs and to the car keys. Law enforcement was aware that the defendant had been seen driving a rental car even though he’d also been seen driving another car. As the court has found, Judge Dries had reason to view these facts as indicia of drug trafficking, not use.” United States v. Boyd, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69476 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 11, 2025).*

Looking at the police car traffic stop video, there was a factual basis for defendant’s failure to signal even if it affected no other traffic. The stop was justified. Ismail v. Robinson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68357 (D. Me. Apr. 10, 2025).*

The Fourth Amendment has nothing to do with prison denial of medical care. Scutella v. Trinity Food Servs., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69279 n.4 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 8, 2025).*

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: PC was shown for a warrant for five cell phones for use in trafficking drugs

D.Md.: Is product of SW for Md. home of Jan.6 def leading to FIPF case covered by Jan.6 pardon?

Does defendant’s January 20, 2025 pardon for being a Jan. 6th Capitol defendant cover his being charged with being a felon in possession in his home when a search warrant for the Jan. 6th case was executed at his house? The government first argued it didn’t; then it argued it did. [That’s the current DoJ for you.] Brief it. United States v. Costianes, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69249 (D. Md. Apr. 10, 2025)*:

Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Md.: Is product of SW for Md. home of Jan.6 def leading to FIPF case covered by Jan.6 pardon?

D.Nev.: Cell tower dump to solve a murder was a general warrant, but not suppressed

A California state judge issued a cell tower dump warrant to attempt to find who could have been involved in two dead bodies in the desert. The judge testified at the suppression hearing in the District of Nevada. The cell tower dump here was a Fourth Amendment general search, but the court declines to suppress. The product of that search led to 90 other warrants. United States v. Spurlock, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69360 (D. Nev. Apr. 11, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Cell site location information, General warrant | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Cell tower dump to solve a murder was a general warrant, but not suppressed

OH5: Place and time of encounter plus serious sweating and making not much sense when talking here added up to RS

Place and time of encounter plus serious sweating and making not much sense when talking added up to reasonable suspicion. State v. Doering, 2025-Ohio-1297 (5th Dist. Apr. 10, 2025).* An interesting set of facts:

Continue reading
Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: Place and time of encounter plus serious sweating and making not much sense when talking here added up to RS

D.Alaska: Recklessly omitted text messages were material to PC finding; suppression granted

Omitted text messages were material to the probable cause finding, and the officer was at least reckless in not including them. Franks satisfied: “Therefore, the Court agrees with Judge Scoble’s reasoning, adopts his analysis, and finds that, had Detective Ruble included information about the text messages in the affidavit, the affidavit would not support probable cause to believe that evidence of assault or felon in possession would be found on the cell phone.” United States v. Carlton, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69364 (D. Alaska Apr. 11, 2025).

“The Court has reviewed the transcript from the suppression hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, and Powell’s objections. The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that Boone and Pendley were credible is supported by the record and not unbelievable; Powell’s objections are insufficient to undermine the Magistrate Judge’s credibility findings. Powell’s objections are therefore due to be overruled.” Defendant’s pretext argument fails. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69563 (M.D. Ala. Apr. 11, 2025).*

2255 petitioner showed no contested issues of fact, so he doesn’t get a hearing. United States v. Lopez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69483 (D. Conn. Apr. 11, 2025).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Recklessly omitted text messages were material to PC finding; suppression granted

CA10: Disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment

A disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment. Jones v. Woodrow, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8419 (10th Cir. Apr. 10, 2025).*

Defendant’s stop was valid because of a defective LPN light. This led to discovering a lack of insurance, and that properly extended the stop. State v. Mensch, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 317 (Apr. 9, 2025).*

“The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals held that counsel’s failure to research and file a motion to suppress on Fourth Amendment grounds was neither deficient nor prejudicial because, based on the evidence presented at the postconviction hearing, such a motion would not have been successful. … Harris contends that this conclusion was contrary to, or based on an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law. … He has failed to meet his burden under § 2254(d)(1).” Harris v. Boyd, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69647 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 11, 2025).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Disabled vehicle left parked along a highway is subject to impoundment

TX3: It was a fair inference for PC that evidence of def’s social media posts were on his phone

Defendant was a suspect in a driveby shooting. Because defendant’s social media showed firearms, it was a fair inference that evidence of the offense or the social media posts would be on his phone. Therefore, there was probable cause for the cell phone. Llanas v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 2503 (Tex. App. – Austin Apr. 11, 2025).*

Defendant didn’t effectively waive his right to appeal, but it doesn’t matter because he loses on the merits of his search claim. People v. Peguero, 2025 NY Slip Op 02134 (1st Dept. Apr. 10, 2025).*

Defendant owned the vehicle searched, but it had been loaned to another at the time of the search. It would appear he should have standing in the vehicle, but that doesn’t have to be decided because the search was valid under the automobile exception, standing or not. United States v. Hightower, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68363 (D. Md. Apr. 10, 2025).*

After defendant moved to suppress CSLI, the government got another warrant for it. The first is thus denied. United States v. Eugene, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68581 (D. Conn. Apr. 10, 2025).*

Posted in Cell phones, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TX3: It was a fair inference for PC that evidence of def’s social media posts were on his phone

CA2: In getting arrest warrant, defenses don’t have to be considered

In a false arrest claim, the officer procuring the warrant doesn’t have to negate plaintiff’s defenses beforehand. Glover v. Onondaga Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8436 (2d Cir. Apr. 10, 2025)*:

Continue reading
Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA2: In getting arrest warrant, defenses don’t have to be considered

CA9: Motel owner can’t assert guests’ rights

“Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claim fails because Plaintiffs cannot assert the rights of the Motel’s guests, Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U.S. 765, 778 (2014), and police entry into the Motel’s public areas does not constitute a search under the Fourth Amendment, Patel v. City of Montclair, 798 F.3d 895, 900 (9th Cir. 2015). The FAC’s remaining allegations concerning police entry into the Motel’s private areas and demand for registration records and video footage are too conclusory to state a claim, as they lack even basic details about the circumstances.” Patel v. City of L.A., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8444 (9th Cir. Apr. 10, 2025).

An abatement action against a motel that plaintiff bought wasn’t a Fourth Amendment violation as to him. Ahir v. City of L.A., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8449 (9th Cir. Apr. 10, 2025).*

Posted in Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Motel owner can’t assert guests’ rights