E.D.Wis.: PC was shown for a warrant for five cell phones for use in trafficking drugs

Probable cause was shown for a warrant for five cell phones for use in trafficking drugs. “The presence of the phones near drugs also gave rise to an inference that any phones associated with the defendant (in cars he drove or in his residence) would contain evidence of drug dealing. The court already has explained that the drugs were packaged in two, sandwich-sized baggies, each containing several smaller, separately wrapped parcels and all within feet of two firearms. The phones officers observed were together and immediately next to the drugs and to the car keys. Law enforcement was aware that the defendant had been seen driving a rental car even though he’d also been seen driving another car. As the court has found, Judge Dries had reason to view these facts as indicia of drug trafficking, not use.” United States v. Boyd, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69476 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 11, 2025).*

Looking at the police car traffic stop video, there was a factual basis for defendant’s failure to signal even if it affected no other traffic. The stop was justified. Ismail v. Robinson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68357 (D. Me. Apr. 10, 2025).*

The Fourth Amendment has nothing to do with prison denial of medical care. Scutella v. Trinity Food Servs., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69279 n.4 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 8, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.