D.Alaska: Recklessly omitted text messages were material to PC finding; suppression granted

Omitted text messages were material to the probable cause finding, and the officer was at least reckless in not including them. Franks satisfied: “Therefore, the Court agrees with Judge Scoble’s reasoning, adopts his analysis, and finds that, had Detective Ruble included information about the text messages in the affidavit, the affidavit would not support probable cause to believe that evidence of assault or felon in possession would be found on the cell phone.” United States v. Carlton, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69364 (D. Alaska Apr. 11, 2025).

“The Court has reviewed the transcript from the suppression hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, and Powell’s objections. The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that Boone and Pendley were credible is supported by the record and not unbelievable; Powell’s objections are insufficient to undermine the Magistrate Judge’s credibility findings. Powell’s objections are therefore due to be overruled.” Defendant’s pretext argument fails. United States v. Powell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69563 (M.D. Ala. Apr. 11, 2025).*

2255 petitioner showed no contested issues of fact, so he doesn’t get a hearing. United States v. Lopez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69483 (D. Conn. Apr. 11, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review, Suppression hearings. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.