NMI: “An arrest warrant is exhausted once used.”

“An arrest warrant is exhausted once used. Carlson v. Landon, 342 U.S. 524, 546 (1952); ….” After that, another must issue. The trial court didn’t err in requiring one. Commonwealth v. Superior Court, 2025 MP 14 (N.M.I. Dec. 23, 2025).

“Detective Strickenberger’s affidavit provides a nexus between the apartment and drug trafficking, and the information in the affidavit was not stale. Even if probable cause were lacking, the undersigned finds the officers executed the search warrant in good faith.” United States v. Barnes, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 265145 (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 23, 2025).*

On petitioner’s application for a CoA from denial of his habeas, it is denied on all grounds. One is a challenge to five searches: two administrative searches and three warrants. He doesn’t show that any of them are unreasonable. Thus, counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging them. Zahraie v. Nagy, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 33779 (6th Cir. Dec. 26, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Nexus. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.