CA10: Nexus subject to GFE

The charge was impersonating an FBI agent at a school student pickup line. A warrant was issued for defendant’s house and computers to see if he bought faux FBI paraphernalia online.* The district court suppressed for lack of nexus. Reversed; there was minimal nexus for the good faith exception: “In addressing whether the good-faith presumption holds, we ask ‘not whether the Magistrate erred in believing there was sufficient probable cause to support the scope of the warrant … [but] instead whether the Magistrate so obviously erred that any reasonable officer would have recognized the error.’ Messerschmidt, 565 U.S. at 556. The focus here is on nexus to the home. Even if Officer Heidlage’s affidavit lacked the requisite nexus between Mr. Williams’s suspected criminal activity and his home for probable cause, it still provided a minimal connection justifying good-faith reliance on it.” United States v. Williams, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 9 (10th Cir. Jan. 2, 2026). [*This has great potential for abuse.]

Officers were looking for defendant, and they saw him. He took off running. He had a red and black backpack. The officer lost him in the brush cover. A little later they found him without the backpack. It was objectively reasonable to believe it had been abandoned when it was found. United States v. Hatfield, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25 (E.D. Ky. Jan. 2, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Nexus. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.