Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

IL: Taking the keys to a car can still be only a Terry seizure, not an arrest

Taking the keys to a car can still be only a Terry seizure, not an arrest. Reasonable suspicion not decided below, so remanded. People v. Pellegrino, 2024 IL App (2d) 230343, 2024 Ill. App. LEXIS 1675 (July 18, 2024). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Taking the keys to a car can still be only a Terry seizure, not an arrest

MS applies exclusionary rule to code enforcers

A code enforcement officer violated the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule is applied. JDB Rentals, LLC v. City of Verona, 2024 Miss. App. LEXIS 290 (July 16, 2024). Defendant waived (or abandoned) any reasonable expectation of privacy in his … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on MS applies exclusionary rule to code enforcers

MT: RS def was too drunk to drive from description, allegedly crawling to car, then officer talking to him

The citizen informant’s defendant was too drunk to drive because he stumbled and crawled to his car was corroborated by observations and smelling him, so there was at least reasonable suspicion. Defendant’s claim that his bar receipt from inside the … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MT: RS def was too drunk to drive from description, allegedly crawling to car, then officer talking to him

OH4: Waiting for backup was prudent for delaying dog sniff even though there was no RS

With a late night stop of a person that had a drug history and the officer was outnumbered, it was prudent to call for backup before the dog sniff, and the total elapsed time wasn’t that much. The court of … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH4: Waiting for backup was prudent for delaying dog sniff even though there was no RS

LA4: Being seen in a “drug hot spot” adds nothing to RS

Being seen in NOLA “drug hot spots” doesn’t add anything to reasonable suspicion. Suppression affirmed. State v. Tate, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 1107 (La. App. 4 Cir. July 11, 2024). The complainant’s telling the police of being drugged for sex … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA4: Being seen in a “drug hot spot” adds nothing to RS

TX10: Even if def’s CSLI was erroneously admitted at trial, it was harmless

Even if defendant’s CSLI was erroneously admitted at trial, it was harmless on this record. State v. Roberts, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 4847 (Tex. App. – Waco July 11, 2024). Leave to file a successor 2255 denied. The Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX10: Even if def’s CSLI was erroneously admitted at trial, it was harmless

CA11: No co-conspirator standing in two cars

Here there were two vehicles stopped. Defendant was a passenger in one, and he had no standing in either merely being a co-conspirator to a drug operation. United States v. Lewis, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 16803 (11th Cir. July 10, … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: No co-conspirator standing in two cars

D.P.R.: A cell phone found with drugs had its incriminating nature immediately apparent for plain view

A cell phone found with drugs had its incriminating nature immediately apparent for plain view. United States v. Fernandez-Santos, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121462 (D.P.R. July 8, 2024). In an illegal entry case, identification evidence allegedly illegally seized is not … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.P.R.: A cell phone found with drugs had its incriminating nature immediately apparent for plain view

MA: Kicking off shoes when police asked for them showed consent

Kicking off one’s sneakers when police asked for them was consent. Commonwealth v. Rodrigues, 2024 Mass. App. LEXIS 91 (July 11, 2024). This search warrant in a RICO case adequately showed probable cause for defendant’s cell phone. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Kicking off shoes when police asked for them showed consent

KS: Extending stop on a hunch lacked RS

“LaGuardia argues that Officer Opperman lacked reasonable suspicion to extend the stop from a crash report to a DUI investigation. He claims that the officer investigated LaGuardia for DUI only because he abandoned his vehicle after the accident in snowy … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: Extending stop on a hunch lacked RS

MI: The officer’s contact with def alone in a “high crime” area wasn’t RS

The officer here approached defendant in his parked car in an apartment complex parking lot without reasonable suspicion to inquire of what he was doing there. That ultimately led to an assault charge. Summarily reversed and dismissed without argument: There … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: The officer’s contact with def alone in a “high crime” area wasn’t RS

S.D.Ga.: State knock-and-announce statute, if it applies at all, doesn’t confer standing on an alleged guest

Plaintiff said she was an overnight guest at the house searched and thus had standing, except that was never proved. “None of those facts are present here, as there is no record evidence showing that James had personal belongings in … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Exclusionary rule, Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: State knock-and-announce statute, if it applies at all, doesn’t confer standing on an alleged guest

CA5: The fact the officer was in an interstate highway drug interdiction team was unavailing because there was a lawful basis for the stop

“Rocha Nevarez’s argument that the stop was unlawful from the start because the trooper was part of a roving drug interdiction team is unavailing. The state trooper witnessed Rocha Nevarez drift over the fog line on eastbound Interstate 20 on … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: The fact the officer was in an interstate highway drug interdiction team was unavailing because there was a lawful basis for the stop

D.N.M.: Summary judgment for defs denied in Torres v. Madrid on remand

On remand in Torres v. Madrid, 141 S. Ct. 989, 209 L.Ed.2d 190 (Mar. 25, 2021), the defendant’s summary judgment motion is denied. Torres v. Madrid, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117079 (D.N.M. July 2, 2024).* An out-of-state temporary plate where … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Summary judgment for defs denied in Torres v. Madrid on remand

NC: Wife had sufficient common authority over cell phone to consent to seizure and search

Defendant allowed his cell phone to be used by everyone in the family, including his child to watch YouTube videos. His wife had sufficient common authority to consent to a seizure and search. State v. Duran-Rivas, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Wife had sufficient common authority over cell phone to consent to seizure and search

D.N.J.: Car leasing company had no 4A claim to car’s lawful impoundment, despite not knowing for 11 months

Honda leased a car that was impounded and towed from the driver because it was unlicensed. Eleven months later Honda located the car and there were thousands of accumulated fees. Honda sued under § 1983. The initial seizure was valid … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Car leasing company had no 4A claim to car’s lawful impoundment, despite not knowing for 11 months

N.D.Ohio: When a stop is based on a law enforcement database, does reliability have to be shown? Here there was more

When a stop is based on a computerized law enforcement database, whether it has to be corroborated (see Gonzalez v. United States Immigration. & Customs Enf’t, 975 F.3d 788, 819 (9th Cir. 2020)) isn’t decided here because here there was … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: When a stop is based on a law enforcement database, does reliability have to be shown? Here there was more

LA1: Opening car door to check for others after speeding stop was reasonable where windows were overtinted

Defendant was seen at 10 pm on radar going 94 in a 35, and the officer gave chase for over four miles, sometimes clocking defendant at 135. When finally stopped and with defendant in the police car, the officer went … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on LA1: Opening car door to check for others after speeding stop was reasonable where windows were overtinted

D.Ariz.: “The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant”

“‘The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant. The determination of probable cause is based upon a “totality of the circumstances” test, and the government’s evidence must be more than that which … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Forfeiture, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: “The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant”

CT: Pretrial detainees still have no REP in jail calls

There is no constitutional distinction between pretrial detainees and convicts in a jail for the reasonable expectation of privacy in telephone calls on a jail line phone they knew was recorded. State v. Bember, 2024 Conn. LEXIS 153 (June 25, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CT: Pretrial detainees still have no REP in jail calls