LA4: Being seen in a “drug hot spot” adds nothing to RS

Being seen in NOLA “drug hot spots” doesn’t add anything to reasonable suspicion. Suppression affirmed. State v. Tate, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 1107 (La. App. 4 Cir. July 11, 2024).

The complainant’s telling the police of being drugged for sex and finding videos of it taken by defendant on his cell phone was probable cause for this warrant. People v. Giacopelli, 2024 NY Slip Op 50869, 2024 NYLJ LEXIS 2157 (Putnam Co. July 9, 2024).*

Leave to file a successor habeas denied. This is a reiteration of a Fourth Amendment and ineffective assistance of counsel claim already denied. In re Simpkins, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17091 (11th Cir. July 11, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.