Author Archives: Hall

E.D.N.C.: No REP in tent in homeless encampment that was trespassing on private property

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his tent in a homeless encampment on someone else’s private property. That’s “wrongful presence.” He also disclaimed the tent, but standing is enough to deny relief. United States v. Tillman, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: No REP in tent in homeless encampment that was trespassing on private property

W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

The search warrant for a gun involved in shooting was not stale 11 days after the shooting. Firearms are durable and not consumables. United States v. Williams, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4950 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2026). The warrant for … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

D.Mass.: Cell site tower dump governed by Carpenter, but GFE applies here because there’s almost no case anywhere else

A cell site tower dump to see who was there at the time of the crime is governed by Carpenter, but the law is completely unclear and the good faith exception saves it. United States v. McDonald, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Cell site tower dump governed by Carpenter, but GFE applies here because there’s almost no case anywhere else

D.Idaho: Ping information not stale

The ping information warrant here was not stale. United States v. Torres, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4593 (D. Idaho Jan. 9, 2026). [It also seems like it would never get stale. It is information not subject to change; if anything, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Cell site location information, Pretext, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Ping information not stale

AP: What to know about the warrants most immigration agents use to make arrests

AP: What to know about the warrants most immigration agents use to make arrests by Safiyah Riddle and Valerie Gonzalez:

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on AP: What to know about the warrants most immigration agents use to make arrests

E.D.Okla.: Def’s high speed chase was PC

Defendant’s high speed chase was probable cause. “Defendant’s egregious eluding combined with his throwing an object from his vehicle combine to establish probable cause to search the Defendant’s vehicle under the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement.” United … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Def’s high speed chase was PC

CA6: Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim

Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim for relief. Malicious interference would, but that’s not alleged. Tucker v. Horn, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 531 (6th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026). Not search case, but defendant was suspected … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Random and isolated interference with prisoner mail doesn’t state a claim

D.D.C.: A private tow didn’t violate US Capitol Police inventory policy or 4A

The US Capitol Police inventory policy was followed here, and the motion to suppress is denied. The fact a private company towed the vehicle is of no moment to the policy or the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Johnson, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Inventory | Comments Off on D.D.C.: A private tow didn’t violate US Capitol Police inventory policy or 4A

E.D.Ky.: DTF stop on interstate wasn’t pretextual when it was objectively reasonable for overtinting

It doesn’t matter that DTF officers were on the interstate and ordered defendant’s stop for a window tint violation because there was objective justification for it. The rest of the stop was with reasonable suspicion for the drug dog. United … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: DTF stop on interstate wasn’t pretextual when it was objectively reasonable for overtinting

D.S.D.: No standing in employer’s laptop

2255 petitioner fails on standing to contest of search of this laptop. Based on all the court can see, including the PSR description, the laptop belonged to his employer, not him. All the electronic devices of the employer were seized. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.D.: No standing in employer’s laptop

E.D.Mich.: No standing in mobile home defendant burned down

In direct appeal of his conviction, defendant was found not to have standing in the mobile home he burned because he no longer had any reasonable expectation of privacy in it. He’s Stoned out on habeas too. Sindone v. Miniard, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No standing in mobile home defendant burned down

N.D.Iowa: Affidavit for SW could have been more explicit, but it still was good enough for PC

The affidavit for warrant isn’t perfect but it’s good enough for the issuing magistrate to draw inferences. “Again, the affidavit could have been improved with explicit explanations of the ‘how’ and ‘why.’ But I do not fault an experienced judge … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Affidavit for SW could have been more explicit, but it still was good enough for PC

DE: Judge issuing track and trace order didn’t have to recuse from trial

The fact “the judge who presided over trial had signed a pen register or ‘track and trace’ warrant before [defendant’s] arrest” didn’t require recusal. The state court had already held issuing a search warrant didn’t require recusal either. Fayton v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Judge issuing track and trace order didn’t have to recuse from trial

D.D.C.: A dozen officers involved in traffic stop slow walked it for drug dog

A dozen officers purposely delayed the traffic stop for a dog sniff. “The Government has failed to show that police conducted this stop in a reasonably diligent manner. To the contrary, Officer Brennan’s decision to delegate all four warnings to … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.D.C.: A dozen officers involved in traffic stop slow walked it for drug dog

GA: REP against dog sniff at apartment door in gated complex where management let police in

A dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door seams was unreasonable, despite it being in a common area of a gated apartment building [where the general public wasn’t allowed, but management let the police in]. State v. West, 2026 Ga. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on GA: REP against dog sniff at apartment door in gated complex where management let police in

E.D.Cal.: Email seizure can be overbroad, but actual search has to be reasonably narrowed

In digital information searches, overseizure to start is permitted to facilitate the process, but the review of all that information has to be limited, and here it was. United States v. Flores, 802 F.3d 1028, 1044 (9th Cir. 2015). United … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Searches, E-mail, Overseizure | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Email seizure can be overbroad, but actual search has to be reasonably narrowed

D.Mass.: Late disclosed information provided Franks challenge

How one defendant made a Franks challenge to get a hearing out of late disclosed information. United States v. Gonzalez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3229 (D. Mass. Jan. 8, 2026)*:

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Late disclosed information provided Franks challenge

D.Ariz.: No standing while violating order of protection

Being inside the garage of this house in violation of an order of protection means no standing. Hernandez v. Chandler, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3096 (D. Ariz. Jan. 7, 2026). The visual sweep of defendant’s car was just meticulous and … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No standing while violating order of protection

CA9: RIPP restraint was seizure and no QI here

Decedent died in a police car with an RIPP restraint bending him backwards. That’s a seizure, and the officers here do not get qualified immunity in the excessive force claim. Gonzalez v. City of Phx., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 426 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: RIPP restraint was seizure and no QI here

NC: DL, LPN, and insurance checkpoint was reasonable

The Saint Pauls NC police department set up a two-hour checkpoint to stop all cars to check for “violations of license, registration, and insurance requirements.” Defendant was stopped and asked for his DL but he didn’t have one. The smell … Continue reading

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on NC: DL, LPN, and insurance checkpoint was reasonable