D.Idaho: Ping information not stale

The ping information warrant here was not stale. United States v. Torres, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4593 (D. Idaho Jan. 9, 2026). [It also seems like it would never get stale. It is information not subject to change; if anything, the data would be lost over time, and that’s not a staleness issue–it’s just gone.]

There was probable cause for issuance of the administrative warrant, and that permitted officers to pass by appellant’s no trespassing sign. Deitz v. Clerk of Courts of Shelby Cty., 2026-Ohio-63, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 55 (3d Dist. Jan. 12, 2026).*

The search warrant here did not include searching appellant’s wallet and seizing his bank card that led to further inquiries. The suppression order is affirmed. People v. Galloway, 2026 Mich. App. LEXIS 238 (Jan. 9, 2026)* (unpublished).

Defendant’s stop for riding a bicycle after sunset without lights was valid. United States v. Johnson, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 726 (11th Cir. Jan. 12, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Cell site location information, Pretext, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.