Author Archives: Hall

NC: Dog sniff of package in mail stream reasonable

A dog sniff of a package in the mail stream is reasonable. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy from a dog sniff there. State v. Teague, 2022-NCCOA-600, 2022 N.C. App. LEXIS 748 (Nov. 1, 2022). Defendants’ motion in limine … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, E-mail, Inevitable discovery, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on NC: Dog sniff of package in mail stream reasonable

E.D.Mo.: Attenuation doctrine can apply to a Rodriguez violation

The attenuation doctrine can apply to a Rodriguez violation. United States v. Wright, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203269 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 8, 2022). On the surface, there was no reasonable suspicion for extending this stop. The court sets a hearing. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Attenuation doctrine can apply to a Rodriguez violation

CA6: Officer’s mistake he’d worked with CI before not shown to be Franks violation

Officer’s mistake in saying he’d worked with CI before that proved false still wasn’t enough to show a Franks violation because it could just be an innocent mistake and not enough to undermine the probable cause. United States v. Duncan, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Officer’s mistake he’d worked with CI before not shown to be Franks violation

CA10: Not unreasonable for state court to not apply exclusionary rule in sentencing

Under the unreasonable application standard of 2254, the Utah court did not unreasonably conclude the exclusionary rule would not be applied in the sentencing phase of a criminal trial. Menzies v. Powell, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 30789 (10th Cir. Nov. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Not unreasonable for state court to not apply exclusionary rule in sentencing

Reason: Houston Prosecutors Are Keeping Cash Seized From Defendants Whose Cases Were Compromised by Police Corruption

Reason: Houston Prosecutors Are Keeping Cash Seized From Defendants Whose Cases Were Compromised by Police Corruption by Jacob Sullum (“Even in cases that hinged on the trustworthiness of demonstrably untrustworthy cops, people are still waiting to get their money back.”)

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: Houston Prosecutors Are Keeping Cash Seized From Defendants Whose Cases Were Compromised by Police Corruption

E.D.N.Y.: NYPD’s I-Card system when based on PC satisfies collective knowledge

NYPD issues what it calls an “I-Card” (“Activate Investigation Card”) which is supposed to be based on probable cause to believe a person committed a felony. With probable cause, the I-Card provides collective knowledge for an arrest. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: NYPD’s I-Card system when based on PC satisfies collective knowledge

D.D.C.: When stop was extended without RS, def’s assault on officers was not attenuated under Brown

The court finds the stop without reasonable suspicion. It was allegedly justified by paper LPN that didn’t match the car as without reasonable suspicion because the tags weren’t run until after the stop. That and other factors don’t make reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.D.C.: When stop was extended without RS, def’s assault on officers was not attenuated under Brown

CA6: City’s order closing hotel ptfs lived in didn’t violate 4A

Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment rights weren’t violated by the city’s order closing the motel they lived in because it was uninhabitable. There was a limited time they were without their personal property, but they were shortly allowed access to retrieve things. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: City’s order closing hotel ptfs lived in didn’t violate 4A

OH1: No exclusionary rule for this alleged statutory violation for lack of notice of a probation search condition

Defendant’s contention the probation department failed to notify him of his search condition was a statutory violation but there is no exclusionary remedy for that. State v. Hayden, 2022-Ohio-3933, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 3721 (1st Dist. Nov. 4, 2022). In … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH1: No exclusionary rule for this alleged statutory violation for lack of notice of a probation search condition

W.D.N.C.: Def did not abandon backpack by hiding it nearby in bushes; he retained control

Defendant was at a McDonald’s with friends outside a car. When he saw the police, he put his backpack in the bushes to hide it while remaining nearby. He also went back to it to push it deeper into the … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Def did not abandon backpack by hiding it nearby in bushes; he retained control

D.Md.: Body armor found during vehicle search in drug case not more prejudicial than relevant

Body armor found during a vehicle search under a warrant is not excluded as more prejudicial than relevant under F.R.E. 403. This is a drug case, and it’s no more prejudicial than the drugs and firearms that presumably will be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on D.Md.: Body armor found during vehicle search in drug case not more prejudicial than relevant

E.D.Ky.: Guns found during drug seizable as instrumentality of crime

In a drug search warrant, firearms found during the search are seizable as an instrumentality of a drug crime. United States v. Wilkins, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200342 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 19, 2022). Defendant’s running from his car during a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Guns found during drug seizable as instrumentality of crime

N.D.Tex.: Officers don’t have to say they have PC before an automobile exception search

The officers didn’t say they had probable cause at the beginning of the search of the vehicle, but on the totality they did. United States v. Wesley, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200320 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2022).* The Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Nexus, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Officers don’t have to say they have PC before an automobile exception search

D.Minn.: Court won’t enjoin investigation after SW on ptf’s cell phone

Plaintiff can’t get access to search warrant papers yet because of an ongoing investigation. Second, the court won’t enjoin the use of the information from his seized telephone or order its return because of the ongoing investigation. Lindell v. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Court won’t enjoin investigation after SW on ptf’s cell phone

E.D.Cal.: Govt failed in its burden of proof on justification for protective sweep

The court finds, with the evidence in equipoise, the government didn’t meet its burden of showing the arrest happened inside defendant’s house or outside. This is critical, because the police did a protective sweep and used that to get a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Govt failed in its burden of proof on justification for protective sweep

D.Me.: DEA could subpoena records investigating robbery of a marijuana dispensary

The DEA’s administrative subpoenas over records of the suspect over the alleged robbery of a marijuana dispensary were lawful exercises of power. Carpenter does not apply to mere phone records. United States v. Candelario, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199195 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.Me.: DEA could subpoena records investigating robbery of a marijuana dispensary

NY2: Trial court didn’t deny due process by deciding suppression motion on a ground not argued by state, except for being just wrong on the law

The trial court did not deny due process by deciding the suppression issue on an alternative ground not advanced by the state below. The problem is, however, that the record does not support the result below, and it is reversed. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Due process, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NY2: Trial court didn’t deny due process by deciding suppression motion on a ground not argued by state, except for being just wrong on the law

The Recorder: Court Can’t Grant Request to Return John Eastman’s Emails, Jan. 6 Committee Says

The Recorder: Court Can’t Grant Request to Return John Eastman’s Emails, Jan. 6 Committee Says (“The committee said constitutional provisions, and Eastman’s own late filing, should end his appeal.”)

Posted in E-mail, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on The Recorder: Court Can’t Grant Request to Return John Eastman’s Emails, Jan. 6 Committee Says

GA: Consent to search backpack included laptop inside when def didn’t object

Defendant clearly consented to a search of his backpack. When the officer encountered his laptop and opened it to turn it on, defendant never objected. Winslow v. State, 2022 Ga. LEXIS 297 (Nov. 2, 2022). The underlying facts for reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on GA: Consent to search backpack included laptop inside when def didn’t object

ID: Not telling arrestee reason for arrest in violation of statute not a 4A violation

Failure to notify an arrestee of the reason for his arrest in violation of the statute does not make the arrest violate the Fourth Amendment or state constitution. State v. Lancaster, 2022 Ida. LEXIS 133 (Nov. 1, 2022). There were … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Body searches, Cell phones, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on ID: Not telling arrestee reason for arrest in violation of statute not a 4A violation