Author Archives: Hall

CA9: Joint Cambodian-U.S. search unlawful under Cambodian law not unlawful here; exclusionary rule not applied

Defendant was the subject of a joint raid in Cambodia by local and U.S. officers. The search of defendant’s room was held unlawful under Cambodian law because there was no written consent of the owner, something with no counterpart in … Continue reading

Posted in Conflict of laws, Exclusionary rule, Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on CA9: Joint Cambodian-U.S. search unlawful under Cambodian law not unlawful here; exclusionary rule not applied

CA10: Govt has to be shown to have property to be ordered to return it under Rule 41(g)

The district court lacked jurisdiction to order return of property under Rule 41(g) because it could not be shown that the government was in possession of the hard drive defendant sought return of. United States v. Toombs, 2023 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA10: Govt has to be shown to have property to be ordered to return it under Rule 41(g)

S.D.N.Y.: Surveillance does not have to be constant for PC to exist

Defendant was stopped because officers had reason to believe that he was transporting parts for ghost guns from New England to a gun show in Pennsylvania, and he was stopped in New York City. There is no constitutional requirement that … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Surveillance does not have to be constant for PC to exist

E.D.Mich.: Telling a detainee in a traffic stop to come to the rear of the car is not an unreasonable seizure

Telling a detainee in a traffic stop to come to the rear of the car is not an unreasonable seizure. United States v. Holmes, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99976 (E.D. Mich. June 8, 2023). The trial court erred in suppressing … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Telling a detainee in a traffic stop to come to the rear of the car is not an unreasonable seizure

CA1: Affidavit for CP failed to show any more than child nudity and lacked PC; no GFE either

The search warrant for defendant’s phone was defective and lacked probable cause. Child nudity alone is not child pornography, and the affidavit tracks the statute and doesn’t show that it was pornography. “We hold that the affidavit failed to cross … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA1: Affidavit for CP failed to show any more than child nudity and lacked PC; no GFE either

WA: Officer’s opening door for welfare check was minimal when he saw body in plain view

The warrantless entry into the home shared by the victim and defendant was justified because the officer’s concern for the victim was reasonable. She had not reported for work, she was not answering her phone, her car was parked in … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Officer’s opening door for welfare check was minimal when he saw body in plain view

CA2: Is the SW description for electronic data “the best that could reasonably be expected under the circumstances”

In a warrant for electronic data, “the Fourth Amendment does not demand ‘a perfect description of the data to be searched and seized.’ … Rather, ‘some ambiguity’ is permitted ‘so long as law enforcement agents have done the best that … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, E-mail, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: Is the SW description for electronic data “the best that could reasonably be expected under the circumstances”

EFF: Victory! New Jersey Court Rules Police Must Give Defendant the Facial Recognition Algorithms Used to Identify Him

EFF: Victory! New Jersey Court Rules Police Must Give Defendant the Facial Recognition Algorithms Used to Identify Him by Karen Gullo (“In a victory for transparency in police use of facial recognition, a New Jersey appellate court today ruled that … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: Victory! New Jersey Court Rules Police Must Give Defendant the Facial Recognition Algorithms Used to Identify Him

E.D.Cal.: 30-minute seizure of cell phone in school that was never searched was not unreasonable

Seizure of a cell phone in school for 30 minutes that was not searched at all was not unreasonable. McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High Sch. Dist., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98392 (E.D. Cal. June 5, 2023).* The warrantless blood … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Due process, Reasonableness, School searches | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: 30-minute seizure of cell phone in school that was never searched was not unreasonable

CA9: Officers must have PC defendant had a parole search condition before the search

Officers must have probable cause to know defendant had a parole search condition before searching, and here they had that. United States v. Estrella, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 13994 (9th Cir. June 6, 2023). (In my state, it comes up … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Officers must have PC defendant had a parole search condition before the search

CA8: ER patient became agitated and security and an LEO realized he was armed; search was reasonable

Defendant came to the Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC) in downtown Minneapolis having been shot in the leg. He refused to let them remove his pants to treat the wound. A hospital protection officer was holding him down, and he … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA8: ER patient became agitated and security and an LEO realized he was armed; search was reasonable

M.D.Pa.: Once police executing a warrant on a home discover it’s multi-family, the search must end and a new SW be obtained

After the police entered the building and conducted a security sweep, they discovered only then it was actually a multi-occupant dwelling. There was no outward appearance there were multiple non-family occupants. The first entry finding a gun was valid. The … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Pole cameras, Privileges, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Once police executing a warrant on a home discover it’s multi-family, the search must end and a new SW be obtained

M.D.Tenn.: Ptf’s § 1983 4A case over his arrest is stayed

“Although Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims survive initial review, the Amended Complaint indicates that Plaintiff is currently involved in state criminal proceedings related to the arrest and seizure that form the basis of those claims. In these circumstances, the Court finds … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Ptf’s § 1983 4A case over his arrest is stayed

MA: Driveway used for parking is not curtilage when car visible to all

Defendant’s vehicle was not parked within the curtilage of his home. The officer’s observations of the vehicle did not constitute a search under the Fourth Amendment or the Mass. Const. Decl. Rights art. 14. Defendant’s house was set back from … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on MA: Driveway used for parking is not curtilage when car visible to all

W.D.Mich.: When the question of PC for a warrant is close, there’s still a substantial basis for finding PC and GFE

The question of probable cause to search these packages was a close call. There clearly was at least reasonable suspicion and some of the same facts support probable cause. On the totality, there was at least a substantial basis for … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: When the question of PC for a warrant is close, there’s still a substantial basis for finding PC and GFE

E.D.N.Y.: Def prevails on a Franks challenge on what he was carrying into his house seen on pole camera

Working from a hearing with a screen shot of a pole camera video, the court concludes that the officer stating defendant was holding a rifle was ultimately with reckless disregard of the truth. Defendant argued he was holding a bouquet … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Pole cameras | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def prevails on a Franks challenge on what he was carrying into his house seen on pole camera

MD reiterates search incident doctrine

Maryland reiterates search incident. “Considering these cases together, a clearer picture of the search incident to arrest exception emerges. Pacheco reminds us that, for the exception to apply, there must first exist probable cause to arrest before conducting the search. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Search incident | Comments Off on MD reiterates search incident doctrine

N.D.Cal.: Subpoena to Microsoft to attempt to show it was a state actor in NCMEC report is quashed as burdensome

Defendant’s Rule 17 subpoena to Microsoft to attempt to show that the cybertip to NCMEC was not a private search is quashed as unreasonable and burdensome. United States v. Burley, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96642 (N.D. Cal. June 2, 2023)*:

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Subpoena to Microsoft to attempt to show it was a state actor in NCMEC report is quashed as burdensome

Reason: Connecticut Couple Challenges Warrantless Surveillance of Their Property by Camera-Carrying Bears

Reason: Connecticut Couple Challenges Warrantless Surveillance of Their Property by Camera-Carrying Bears by Jacob Sullum (“The lawsuit looks iffy in light of the Supreme Court’s ‘open fields’ doctrine.”):

Posted in Open fields | Comments Off on Reason: Connecticut Couple Challenges Warrantless Surveillance of Their Property by Camera-Carrying Bears

CA3: Gov’t gets no relief from waiver of 4A argument under separation of powers

The government waived a potentially valuable suppression argument during the suppression hearing, and the evidence was suppressed. The court of appeals declines to give the government a pass on waiver because it would violate separation of powers. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Waiver | Comments Off on CA3: Gov’t gets no relief from waiver of 4A argument under separation of powers