E.D.Mich.: Telling a detainee in a traffic stop to come to the rear of the car is not an unreasonable seizure

Telling a detainee in a traffic stop to come to the rear of the car is not an unreasonable seizure. United States v. Holmes, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99976 (E.D. Mich. June 8, 2023).

The trial court erred in suppressing the product of defendant’s stop and smell of alcohol about his person. There was probable cause for the vehicle warrant for evidence of DUI manslaughter. State v. Acevedo, 2023 Fla. App. LEXIS 3767 (Fla. 4th DCA June 7, 2023).*

“To be clear, we express no opinion as to whether the officers had any legal justification to stop defendant Jones’s vehicle or arrest him or whether ShotSpotter is reliable for purposes of the fourth amendment. The trial court can decide those issues in a suppression hearing.” People v. Jones, 2023 IL App (1st) 221311, 2023 Ill. App. LEXIS 195 (June 7, 2023).*

Defendant waived his Rodriguez claim by pleading guilty. He also can’t succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim because he’d lose on the merits. McGuire v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99312 (W.D. Tenn. June 7, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.