PA: Whether an area is “high crime” for RS purposes needs to be evaluated with caution

“We granted discretionary review to consider the quantum of evidence necessary to prove an area is high in crime, such that a suppression court may properly consider that fact among the totality of the circumstances when assessing whether reasonable suspicion existed at the time of a stop. More specifically, appellant Anthony Lewis asks us to impose a strict, multi-element test on the Commonwealth anytime it wishes to designate the scene of a stop as a “high-crime area.” We decline the invitation. For the reasons that follow, we leave it to the discretion of suppression courts to determine whether the Commonwealth has proven an area is high in crime, as well as how much weight to assign to this factor. In so doing, we urge suppression courts to review high-crime area designations with caution and emphasize that merely intoning buzzwords is never sufficient to prove an area is high in crime. Applying these principles to this case, we find the evidence supports the suppression court’s conclusion that the scene of the stop was a high-crime area. We further hold the police had reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory detention based on the totality of the circumstances, including the high-crime nature of the area. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Superior Court upholding the denial of suppression.” Commonwealth v. Lewis, 2025 Pa. LEXIS 1498 (Sep. 25, 2025).

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Whether an area is “high crime” for RS purposes needs to be evaluated with caution

CA11: Officers reasonably concluded that this was one residence without apartments

“At the time the officers swore out and executed the warrant, the officers believed 4279 Violet Circle was a single-family home that Schmitz occupied.” The officers’ investigation for months never indicated that the premises included three efficiency apartments. “In sum, Schmitz has failed to show that the officers in this case knew or should have known that 4279 Violet Circle was a multi-unit residence. Indeed, the record reflects that officers reasonably believed, based on a reasonable investigation, that the residence was a single-family home when they sought the first search warrant. Accordingly, the warrant was valid.” United States v. Schmitz, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24903 (11th Cir. Sep. 25, 2025).

Plaintiffs prevailed in the wrongful seizure claim and the jury awarded $5,000, $1, and $10,000 in punitives. This supported an attorney’s fees award of $356,405 and costs of $2,266.55. The settlement offer was $80,000. (The top hourly rate was $500 then adjusted for various things.) Cremeans v. Taczak, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190283 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 26, 2025).*

Defendant’s driving showed a traffic offense and, during the stop, the occupants feigned being asleep. This was on a corridor of immigrant smuggling, and it all added up to reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. United States v. Bohn, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190012 (D. Ariz. Sep. 25, 2025).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Officers reasonably concluded that this was one residence without apartments

OH5: Alleged jurisdictional defect in warrant issuance didn’t undermine PC; no dispute as to that

Alleged defects in which court should or could issue this particular warrant was subject to the good faith exception. There was no contention that the affidavit for warrant lacked probable cause. State v. Wharton, 2025-Ohio-4485 (5th Dist. Sep. 25, 2025).

Defendant relies on more than just his name in the affidavit as a resident to show his standing. He actually showed a connection. Otherwise, the affidavit is based on probable cause with nexus, and the good faith exception applied. United States v. Sullivan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190320 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 26, 2025).*

The fact two officers arriving at the scene separately responded to the threat differently doesn’t mean they don’t get qualified immunity. On these facts, they reasonably concluded there was a threat of harm from decedent waving a gun and threatening them and others. Their bodycams showed it all. “The circumstance confronting Offerman and McQuay, however, was at most on the ‘hazy border between excessive and acceptable force,’ which demands an analog in case law. Kisela, 584 U.S. at 105 (quotation omitted). At the time of the shooting, it is undisputed that the officers had a reasonable belief that Pam had (1) not been complying with commands for approximately 15 seconds, (2) pointed his gun at Geier, (3) pointed his weapon at Geier’s dog, (4) tried to enter her home, and (5) put his hands in his pockets when he faced the officers. Then, before the fatal shot, the officers reasonably believed he produced a firearm and began to raise it toward McQuay. Certainly, some reasonable officers would have thought Pam posed an imminent serious threat in these circumstances, which would make the use of deadly force reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Reichle, 566 U.S. at 663-65.” Pam v. City of Evansville, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 25017 (7th Cir. Sep. 26, 2025).*

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on OH5: Alleged jurisdictional defect in warrant issuance didn’t undermine PC; no dispute as to that

D.S.C.: Police and issuing magistrate having same address doesn’t make judge not neutral and detached

Just because the issuing magistrate and the police department share the same address does not prove that the magistrate was not neutral and detached. More is required. Lafoy v. O’Brien, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190411 (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2025).

“Even in reviewing Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint in the light most favorable to it, it alleges that it willingly, even if begrudgingly and disapprovingly, provided Detective Robinson the firearms and other items that he requested. Such consensual compliance with an investigation does not violate the Fourth Amendment.” Krasner Loan Co., Inc. v. Ferraris, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190416 (W.D. Tenn. Sep. 8, 2025).*

“Here, the trial court determined that no exigent circumstances justified the warrantless entry into the Residence. That determination is supported by competent, credible evidence. Officer Schaaf testified that police remained outside for more than an hour before entering, and that the decision to enter was made only after consultation with a superior officer. … The trial court also found that no cries for help were heard, no blood or bullet holes were observed on the residence, and no other objective indicators suggested anyone inside required immediate assistance. While there may have been movement or noise coming from within the Residence, we find such benign circumstances do not, without more, support that immediate aid was required within the Residence sufficient to justify warrantless entry.” State v. Reynolds, 2025-Ohio-4490 (5th Dist. Sep. 26, 2025).*

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Police and issuing magistrate having same address doesn’t make judge not neutral and detached

LAT: Veteran U.S. attorney in California insisted Border Patrol follow a court order. Then she was fired.

LAT: Veteran U.S. attorney in California insisted Border Patrol follow a court order. Then she was fired. By Jessica Garrison (“The acting U.S. attorney in Sacramento has said she was fired after telling the Border Patrol chief in charge of immigration raids in California that his agents were not allowed to arrest people without probable cause in the Central Valley. Michele Beckwith, a career prosecutor who was made the acting U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of California earlier this year, told the New York Times that she was let go after she warned Gregory Bovino, chief of the Border Patrol’s El Centro Sector, that a court injunction blocked him from carrying out indiscriminate immigration raids in Sacramento.”)

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on LAT: Veteran U.S. attorney in California insisted Border Patrol follow a court order. Then she was fired.

AR: Deficient SW affidavit cured by additional testimony

The affidavit for warrant was deficient, but it was adequately supplemented by testimony from the officer about grooming that would have been on his cell phone. Also, the good faith exception applies. Vasquez v. State, 2025 Ark. 134 (Sep. 25, 2025).

Without an enforcement action on a subpoena, the subpoena isn’t ripe for judicial review. Khan v. McDonald, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189149 (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 25, 2025).*

No good cause for filing an out of time motion to suppress is shown. Even if there was, it would be denied on the merits because there was reasonable suspicion for the stop. United States v. York, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187397 (N.D. Iowa Sep. 24, 2025).*

Posted in Good faith exception, Oath or affirmation, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Deficient SW affidavit cured by additional testimony

CA11: Police shooting and hitting a car is a 4A seizure

Police shooting at and hitting a car is a Fourth Amendment seizure, drawing from a common law case that striking a horse is the same as striking the rider. Watkins v. Davis, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24904 (11th Cir. Sep. 25, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Police shooting and hitting a car is a 4A seizure

AP: Chicago approves $90M payout over disgraced ex-sergeant who framed hundreds for drug crimes

AP: Chicago approves $90M payout over disgraced ex-sergeant who framed hundreds for drug crimes by Christine Fernando (“The Chicago City Council on Thursday unanimously approved a $90 million settlement for nearly 200 civil rights violations involving a notorious former police sergeant who framed people for drug crimes they didn’t commit in one of the biggest police misconduct scandals in the city’s history. The groundbreaking deal closes out 176 lawsuits involving 180 wrongfully convicted people who spent close to 200 years combined behind bars, marking an end to one of the Chicago Police Department’s darkest chapters. Disgraced former police Sgt. Ronald Watts and the unit he led for nearly a decade until 2012 was accused of planting drugs on suspects, falsifying police reports and falsely accusing housing project residents and others of drug crimes unless they paid the officers off.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on AP: Chicago approves $90M payout over disgraced ex-sergeant who framed hundreds for drug crimes

Atlanta Black Star: ‘Eight Rounds After I Was on the Ground’: Texas Cops at the Wrong Home Opened Fire on Man Even After He Surrendered

Atlanta Black Star: ‘Eight Rounds After I Was on the Ground’: Texas Cops at the Wrong Home Opened Fire on Man Even After He Surrendered by Carlos Miller (“Another police blunder led to the shooting of a man in Texas who believed his house was being burglarized after hearing loud pounding on his front door at 1:45 a.m. last week. Thomas Simpson said he stepped out of his garage with a gun to confront the alleged intruders, but then dropped the gun when he realized they were cops. But the Grand Prairie police officers claimed they were in fear for their lives and fired several shots after he had dropped the gun. Fortunately, he was only struck once in the leg and is recovering from the gunshot wound.”)

Posted in Excessive force, Nighttime search | Comments Off on Atlanta Black Star: ‘Eight Rounds After I Was on the Ground’: Texas Cops at the Wrong Home Opened Fire on Man Even After He Surrendered

HI: Failure to include affidavit for SW in record precludes appellate review

Failure to include the affidavit for search warrant in the record precludes appellate review. As best the court can on the merits, defendant would lose anyway. State v. Bibbs, 2025 Haw. App. LEXIS 451 (Sep. 22, 2025).

The search of a bag on defendant’s person when he visited his parole officer was reasonable. The PO had a prior tip about the bag, and defendant never showed up with one before. State v. Jenkins, 2025-Ohio-4447 (1st Dist. Sep. 24, 2025). [Who goes to the parole office carrying a gun knowing they’re always subject to search?]

There were two search warrants. They both stand on their own. Even if the first was invalid, which it’s not, it doesn’t affect the second. And there’s probable cause for both. United States v. Banks, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187695 (D. Or. Sep. 24, 2025).*

2254 petitioner had his full and fair opportunity to litigate his search claim in state court, so no habeas relief. Jackson v. Sec’y, Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24747 (11th Cir. Sep. 23, 2025).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Independent source, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: Failure to include affidavit for SW in record precludes appellate review

D.Kan.: Affidavit emailed with SW to judge was considered “attached”

In overcoming a warrant particularity challenge cured by the affidavit, the government satisfied its burden that the affidavits in support of the warrant were emailed to the issuing judge as two pdf files in the same email. They weren’t, of course, stapled together, but they were considered together. United States v. Langhover, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185815 (D. Kan. Sep. 22, 2025).

Defendant’s girlfriend’s statement she was Facetiming him at the time of a shooting was nexus for search of the phone. Mallery v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7487 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Sep. 25, 2025).*

911 anonymous call with details confirmed at the scene was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Hoskins, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187915 (E.D. Va. Sep. 23, 2025).

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Affidavit emailed with SW to judge was considered “attached”

N.D.Ohio: Def’s own statement can be PC without having to prove it

No case says that officers can’t rely on defendant’s own statement when relying on it as probable cause. They don’t have to prove it up. United States v. Alexander, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185275 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 22, 2025).

“Sales’ argument [on lack of probable cause] rests on the proposition that the informants cited in the warrant application were not shown to be credible or corroborated by other sources. The informants’ credibility or reliability was not alleged in the warrant application. However, there is no need to demonstrate reliability of an informant based on prior dealings if the information provided is specific, learned through personal observation, and has been corroborated through other sources. … In this case, the warrant affidavit shows the informants’ information was based on personal observation (either explicit or implicit), fresh, detailed, and, to the extent possible, corroborated by police investigation and surveillance. …” State v. Sales, 2025 Mo. App. LEXIS 625 (Sep. 22, 2025).*

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in sounds coming from his apartment that somebody could record with a cell phone and then complain about him. Ogidi-Ghigbaje v. Riseboro Hous., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186979 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2025).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s own statement can be PC without having to prove it

The Intercept: Courts Block Meta From Sharing Anti-ICE Activists’ Instagram Account Info With Feds

The Intercept: Courts Block Meta From Sharing Anti-ICE Activists’ Instagram Account Info With Feds by Shawn Musgrave (“A federal judge in San Francisco on Wednesday temporarily blocked a federal administrative subpoena aimed at unmasking Instagram accounts that named and shamed a Border Patrol agent who was part of the immigration raids in Los Angeles this summer. The Department of Homeland Security sent an administrative subpoena to Meta in early September demanding the names, email addresses, and phone numbers associated with six separate Instagram accounts. Three Instagram users and immigration activists filed separate motions to quash the subpoena last week.”)

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on The Intercept: Courts Block Meta From Sharing Anti-ICE Activists’ Instagram Account Info With Feds

E.D.Va.: Officer’s mere belief def might be the shooter in an incident based on history alone isn’t RS

An officer’s alleged belief that defendant was capable of being the shooter in an incident based on his history isn’t reasonable suspicion. United States v. Neville, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186545 (E.D. Va. Sep. 22, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Officer’s mere belief def might be the shooter in an incident based on history alone isn’t RS

S.D.N.Y.: No § 1983 claim for officer’s wrongfully obtaining ALPR information for personal reasons

Plaintiff’s § 1983 claim that a police officer used ALPR technology to track her for personal reasons didn’t state a Fourth Amendment claim because of the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy in LPN information. “Here, even if Carpenter provides the correct framework to analyze the purported search, the SAC does not allege sufficient facts for the Court to infer that the LPR database reveals the same ‘depth, breadth, and comprehensive reach’ of information such as CSLI. Carpenter, 585 U.S. at 320. Zambrano alleges only that the LPR helps ‘pinpoint [a] vehicle’s specific whereabouts at a specific time,’ and that Sylvester accessed her LPR location information approximately 111 times.” Rinaldi v. Sylvester, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187115 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2025).

“The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized, or implied, that the defendant’s flight from police officers is the most important factor in the totality of the circumstances analysis.” State v. Williams, 2025 La. App. LEXIS 1781 (La. App. 5 Cir. Sep. 24, 2025).*

“As a primarily matter, we note that driving a third under the speed limit, which Paez was doing, together with other circumstances, has been held to support a finding of reasonable suspicion that the driver was driving while intoxicated.” Paez v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7445 (Tex. App. – San Antonio Sep. 24, 2025).*

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No § 1983 claim for officer’s wrongfully obtaining ALPR information for personal reasons

E.D.Pa.: Two minute “roadblock” for GPS tracked stolen cell phone was reasonable

A two minute “roadblock” to stop robbery suspects with a stolen cell phone transmitting its GPS location was with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Jones, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185143 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2025).

The limitation on search warrants only being executed in the jurisdiction where they are issued doesn’t apply to arrest warrants. State v. Russell, 343 Or. App. 573 (Sep. 24, 2025).

When defendant’s girlfriend opened the door of their place, the police smelled marijuana. That provided probable cause for a warrant. The protective sweep before wasn’t unreasonable. State v. Jarquin, 2025 La. LEXIS 1215 (Sep. 24, 2025).*

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Roadblocks | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Two minute “roadblock” for GPS tracked stolen cell phone was reasonable

D.D.C.: Arrest on outdated warrant doesn’t depend on its underlying validity

Plaintiff’s arrest on an outdated warrant doesn’t depend on the underlying validity of the warrant. Here, the warrant wasn’t purged from the system before plaintiff’s stop and arrest. Otero v. District of Columbia, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185918 (D.D.C. Sep. 22, 2025).

Inmate’s strip search claim fails: “Plaintiff’s allegations do not support a constitutional claim under either context. The Complaint provides no information about the scope of the search, the manner in which the search was conducted, or the justification offered for the search. Plaintiff describes no contact and no harm; he does not describe any actual or perceived danger to his safety.” Payne v. Gerling, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186127 (S.D. Ill. Sep. 22, 2025).*

“‘[A] “full and fair opportunity’ guarantees only ‘the right to present one’s case.’” Watson v. Hulick, 481 F.3d 537, 542 (7th Cir. 2007) (quoting Cabrera, 324 F.3d at 531-32). ‘[I]t does not guarantee a correct result.’ Cabrera, 324 F.3d at 532. Nothing in the state-court record suggests that Strieter was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate her consent claim in state court. The trial court’s hearing on the issue was not a sham. The hearing testimony and the body-cam footage support the trial court’s factual determinations. And the trial court did not commit an egregious error in resolving the consent issue or fail to take the issue seriously. Thus, Stone precludes me from reaching the merits of Strieter’s Fourth Amendment claim.” Strieter v. Cahak, Warden, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185616 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 22, 2025).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Arrest on outdated warrant doesn’t depend on its underlying validity

C.D.Cal.: No REP in bankruptcy trustee records

A person forced into bankruptcy has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his firm records. United States v. Girardi, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186007 (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2025).

Defendant well argued his suppression motion in state court and he doesn’t get to do it again in habeas. Zuniga v. McConahay, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184197 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 19, 2025).*

The search of defendant’s car was reasonable by consent and community caretaking function but not the automobile exception. State v. Falcon, 319 Neb. 911 (Sep. 19, 2025).*

Failure to stop behind the stop line at an intersection justifies a traffic stop. State v. Stevenson, 2025-Ohio-4431 (5th Dist. Sep. 18, 2025).*

Posted in Community caretaking function, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: No REP in bankruptcy trustee records

SCOTUSBlog: The dog sniff at the center of a Supreme Court petition

SCOTUSBlog: The dog sniff at the center of a Supreme Court petition by Kelsey Dallas:

Continue reading
Posted in Dog sniff, Trespass | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: The dog sniff at the center of a Supreme Court petition

LA1: Accelerant detection dog’s alert supported PC despite negative lab test

The fact the accelerant detection dog alerted supports probable cause despite later negative lab tests. State v. Hale, 2025 La. App. LEXIS 1749 (La. App. 1 Cir Sep. 19, 2025).

Officers did not violate curtilage by observing shell casings in defendant’s yard during a knock-and-talk. United States v. Havins, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24406 (9th Cir. Sep. 12, 2025).*

“The Court is not persuaded by the Defendant’s argument. The fact that there are minor inconsistencies regarding the location of the pound of marijuana or the level of activity at the house does not establish a Franks hearing is required here. As discussed in the Recommendation, even assuming the Defendant meets the first prong of the Franks analysis, the totality of the circumstances presents a fair probability that illegal activity was occurring at the home. Every vehicle stopped leaving the residence was found to conceal contraband — drugs and a significant quantity of machine-gun-conversion devices.” United States v. Lausane, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184321 (M.D. Ala. Sep. 19, 2025).*

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Knock and talk | Comments Off on LA1: Accelerant detection dog’s alert supported PC despite negative lab test