Category Archives: Oath or affirmation

OH5: Oath or affirmation requirement satisfied by GFE

Even if the oath or affirmation technically fails here, the good faith exception saves the warrant. State v. Lucas, 2025-Ohio-4863, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 3605 (5th Dist. Oct. 22, 2025). “We conclude that the trial court properly denied the motion … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Oath or affirmation, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on OH5: Oath or affirmation requirement satisfied by GFE

TX3: Failure to swear application for electronic warrant was fatal defect

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the officer who prepared an electronic BAC warrant in the patrol car was not sworn to tell the truth based on the body cam. That was a fatal defect. … Continue reading

Posted in Oath or affirmation, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on TX3: Failure to swear application for electronic warrant was fatal defect

AR: Deficient SW affidavit cured by additional testimony

The affidavit for warrant was deficient, but it was adequately supplemented by testimony from the officer about grooming that would have been on his cell phone. Also, the good faith exception applies. Vasquez v. State, 2025 Ark. 134 (Sep. 25, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Oath or affirmation, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Deficient SW affidavit cured by additional testimony

W.D.N.Y.: Trial cross-exam was properly limited into SW affidavit statements what would have led to minitrials

On defendant’s motion for new trial, the court properly limited cross-examination over statements in a search warrant affidavit that would have led to mini-trials and misled the jury. United States v. Payne, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184595 (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, … Continue reading

Posted in Oath or affirmation | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Trial cross-exam was properly limited into SW affidavit statements what would have led to minitrials

CA9: SW application made “under penalty of perjury” satisfies the “oath or affirmation” requirement

A search warrant application made “under penalty of perjury” satisfies the “oath or affirmation” requirement. United States v. Morrow, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 11933 (9th Cir. May 16, 2023). Defendant prevailed on the merits of his honest services wire fraud … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Oath or affirmation, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: SW application made “under penalty of perjury” satisfies the “oath or affirmation” requirement

CA4: Unsworn information in the investigative file could be used to supplement the PC showing before issuing judge

“The district court correctly concluded that unsworn items in an investigatory file can be used to establish probable cause, and that there is nothing in the record to show that the magistrate judge failed to consider the information available to … Continue reading

Posted in Oath or affirmation, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA4: Unsworn information in the investigative file could be used to supplement the PC showing before issuing judge

WI: Failure to swear SW affiant not 4A violation if officer understood it was under oath

The failure to actually ask the affiant officer “do you swear to tell the truth” isn’t constitutionally required for a search warrant affidavit. The officer need only understand that he or she was swearing to the truth of the contents. … Continue reading

Posted in Oath or affirmation | Comments Off on WI: Failure to swear SW affiant not 4A violation if officer understood it was under oath