D.D.C.: Arrest on outdated warrant doesn’t depend on its underlying validity

Plaintiff’s arrest on an outdated warrant doesn’t depend on the underlying validity of the warrant. Here, the warrant wasn’t purged from the system before plaintiff’s stop and arrest. Otero v. District of Columbia, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185918 (D.D.C. Sep. 22, 2025).

Inmate’s strip search claim fails: “Plaintiff’s allegations do not support a constitutional claim under either context. The Complaint provides no information about the scope of the search, the manner in which the search was conducted, or the justification offered for the search. Plaintiff describes no contact and no harm; he does not describe any actual or perceived danger to his safety.” Payne v. Gerling, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186127 (S.D. Ill. Sep. 22, 2025).*

“‘[A] “full and fair opportunity’ guarantees only ‘the right to present one’s case.’” Watson v. Hulick, 481 F.3d 537, 542 (7th Cir. 2007) (quoting Cabrera, 324 F.3d at 531-32). ‘[I]t does not guarantee a correct result.’ Cabrera, 324 F.3d at 532. Nothing in the state-court record suggests that Strieter was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate her consent claim in state court. The trial court’s hearing on the issue was not a sham. The hearing testimony and the body-cam footage support the trial court’s factual determinations. And the trial court did not commit an egregious error in resolving the consent issue or fail to take the issue seriously. Thus, Stone precludes me from reaching the merits of Strieter’s Fourth Amendment claim.” Strieter v. Cahak, Warden, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185616 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 22, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Strip search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.