D.Kan.: Affidavit emailed with SW to judge was considered “attached”

In overcoming a warrant particularity challenge cured by the affidavit, the government satisfied its burden that the affidavits in support of the warrant were emailed to the issuing judge as two pdf files in the same email. They weren’t, of course, stapled together, but they were considered together. United States v. Langhover, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185815 (D. Kan. Sep. 22, 2025).

Defendant’s girlfriend’s statement she was Facetiming him at the time of a shooting was nexus for search of the phone. Mallery v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7487 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Sep. 25, 2025).*

911 anonymous call with details confirmed at the scene was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Hoskins, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187915 (E.D. Va. Sep. 23, 2025).

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.