Monthly Archives: March 2020

ABAJ: Inmate wins [pretrial] release after jail recorded hundreds of attorney-client calls

ABAJ: Inmate wins release after jail recorded hundreds of attorney-client calls by Stephanie Francis Ward:

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on ABAJ: Inmate wins [pretrial] release after jail recorded hundreds of attorney-client calls

W.D.Wash.: Specialized P2P software for a CP search doesn’t otherwise create a REP issue that doesn’t exist

The government’s use of specialized software to search peer-to-peer files didn’t create a reasonable expectation of privacy claim. “RoundUp, software with certain technological modifications to a public, open-source P2P network sharing client, is designed to access public files that individuals … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Specialized P2P software for a CP search doesn’t otherwise create a REP issue that doesn’t exist

CA2: Even assuming this supervised release search lacked RS, there were facts supporting it and the exclusionary rule will not be applied

Even if the supervised release search here was without reasonable suspicion, the purposes of the exclusionary rule aren’t served. “Even assuming [Officer] Dyckman acted unreasonably in failing to conduct further investigation before executing the search, this is not the kind … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA2: Even assuming this supervised release search lacked RS, there were facts supporting it and the exclusionary rule will not be applied

NYTimes: How National Security Surveillance Nabs More Than Spies

NYTimes: How National Security Surveillance Nabs More Than Spies (“The case against Nassif Sami Daher and Kamel Mohammad Rammal, two Michigan men accused of food stamp fraud, hardly seemed exceptional. But the tool that agents used to investigate them was … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, National security | Comments Off on NYTimes: How National Security Surveillance Nabs More Than Spies

OH10: Lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law on grant of suppression motion requires remand to make them

The trial court’s grant of suppression is reversed and remanded because of its inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law for appellate review. State v. Peeks, 2020-Ohio-889, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 812 (10th Dist. Mar. 10, 2020). Defendant officers … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH10: Lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law on grant of suppression motion requires remand to make them

Cal.1: The state cannot be forced to issue a SW to gather evidence for the defense

The defense sought murder victims’ social media account content, and the trial court refused to quash a subpoena which was challenged under the Stored Communications Act. The materials by statute would have to be produced in camera. As an alternative … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Social media warrants, Staleness, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Cal.1: The state cannot be forced to issue a SW to gather evidence for the defense

W.D.N.Y.: Just because the govt can’t unlock def’s iPhone doesn’t mean he can get return of it under Rule 41(g)

Just because the government hasn’t yet accessed defendant’s iPhone because it can’t crack the code to unlock it doesn’t mean that defendant can get it back under Rule 41(g). It’s still potential evidence. United States v. Morgan, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Particularity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Just because the govt can’t unlock def’s iPhone doesn’t mean he can get return of it under Rule 41(g)

D.Nev.: No REP in prescription drug database from police inspection

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the Nevada prescription drug database because he willingly provided the information to the doctor and the pharmacist, and the police need cause to get access. United States v. Motley, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.Nev.: No REP in prescription drug database from police inspection

E.D.Wis.: No REP child porn sent by Facebook Messenger won’t be retransmitted to police by Facebook

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in child pornography uploaded to Facebook Messenger. Even treating it as email (Warshak), the email provider can turn child pornography over to law enforcement when it is transmitted. Then a further search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Social media warrants, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: No REP child porn sent by Facebook Messenger won’t be retransmitted to police by Facebook

OH3: Arrest of drug offender coming home outside his house led to officers hearing “scurrying about” inside, and that justified warrantless entry

One man under investigation for drug crimes was arrested outside a house when officers went there waiting for him to arrive. On the arrest, officers heard others inside “scurrying around” [how?]. This created exigency and justified a warrantless entry into … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH3: Arrest of drug offender coming home outside his house led to officers hearing “scurrying about” inside, and that justified warrantless entry

OK: Two hours of CSLI in 2012 not excluded

Two hours of CSLI in 2012 to connect defendant to a capital murder was not subject to the exclusionary rule. Carpenter n.3 in 2018 left open this situation. Fuston v. State, 2020 OK CR 4, 2020 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell site location information, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OK: Two hours of CSLI in 2012 not excluded

OR: Mere passenger in vehicle can remove personal belongings before inventory

A passenger in a vehicle to be inventoried after a stop is entitled to notice to retrieve her personal belongings before it happens. Only this is consistent with the purpose of the inventory requirement. Other states are in accord, and … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory | Comments Off on OR: Mere passenger in vehicle can remove personal belongings before inventory

N.D.Iowa: Use of fictitious name on package doesn’t deny standing

A person using a fictitious name to send or receive a package still has standing in the package, collecting cases on both sides. In this case, there was reasonable suspicion to divert the package in transit. United States v. Yodprasit, … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Use of fictitious name on package doesn’t deny standing

D.Kan.: By not stopping before his driveway, def consented to police entry onto the curtilage

Officers attempted to stop defendant’s car but he drove to his driveway. There ultimately was a dog sniff of the car. The court finds that, by driving to his driveway with police behind him, his actions were consent for police … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage | Comments Off on D.Kan.: By not stopping before his driveway, def consented to police entry onto the curtilage

S.D.Ga.: There is no per se staleness, and how is DNA stale?

There is no per se staleness. A new warrant for defendant’s DNA alleging it was previously drawn in 2005 and 2007 and matched wasn’t stale. How does DNA change? It doesn’t. United States v. Williams, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38735 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, DNA, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: There is no per se staleness, and how is DNA stale?

D.P.R.: Search of room six hours before SW issued (not to mention lies about it) leads to suppression

The search of defendant’s room was six hours before the search warrant was issued. It was an investigative search and not a protective sweep. The officer admitted that he was looking for something to put in the affidavit for the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Search of room six hours before SW issued (not to mention lies about it) leads to suppression

TN: Hair follicle test of parents in juvenile court on less than PC was justified by special needs doctrine

The juvenile court here had justification to order a hair follicle test on defendant for drug use because of the high interest in protecting the children. The search was justified under special needs. That ultimately led to his prosecution. State … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Special needs | Comments Off on TN: Hair follicle test of parents in juvenile court on less than PC was justified by special needs doctrine

MA: Purported inventory of cell phone was investigative and unreasonable

Defendant was arrested on suspicion of murder, and he had a cell phone in his pocket that he was using, his younger brother’s. The seizure of the phone was proper, but the purported inventory of the phone was not because … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on MA: Purported inventory of cell phone was investigative and unreasonable

OR: PC backpack contained evidence of theft; search incident permitted despite it being dropped over fence when police approached

Defendant was carrying a backpack that police had good reason to believe contained evidence of a theft. When the police came up, the backpack was tossed over a fence but was nearby. Dropping the backpack over the fence did not … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on OR: PC backpack contained evidence of theft; search incident permitted despite it being dropped over fence when police approached

D.N.M.: Motions to quash denied in hearing on Microsoft’s relationship to NCMEC under Ackerman

Defendant gets a hearing on Microsoft’s relationship to NCMEC under Ackerman. The issue in this opinion deals with motions to quash testimony from two of three Microsoft employees. United States v. Rosenschein, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38319 (D.N.M. Mar. 5, … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Motions to quash denied in hearing on Microsoft’s relationship to NCMEC under Ackerman