Daily Archives: March 7, 2020

CA5: Def’s office in building behind his house was properly searched under IRS SW for house/office for records where officers relied on address publicly listed

IRS agents’ search of the home office behind defendant’s home was reasonable and did not violate the Fourth Amendment where the search warrant described defendant’s primary residence but the office carried a different address. It was reasonable to believe the … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA5: Def’s office in building behind his house was properly searched under IRS SW for house/office for records where officers relied on address publicly listed

IA: Possible presence of runaway 14 yo not exigency for warrantless entry

A runaway child was not an exigency justifying a warrantless entry into defendant’s home. “Today we must decide if a police officer may enter a third party’s residence without a search warrant based on a verbal request from the Iowa … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IA: Possible presence of runaway 14 yo not exigency for warrantless entry

D.N.M.: Officers had PC to believe def was inside for execution of arrest warrant

The officers had at least a fair probability that defendant was inside for execution of the arrest warrant in Arizona and the case was indicted in New Mexico. The standards are different between the Ninth and Tenth Circuits, so which … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Officers had PC to believe def was inside for execution of arrest warrant

CA2: Arrest for selling crack justifies search incident

Arrest for selling crack justified a search incident, and the district court erred in holding otherwise. United States v. Williams, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 6768 (2d Cir. Mar. 4, 2020). The evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion the search was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA2: Arrest for selling crack justifies search incident

LA2: Continuation of stop was without RS

The continuation of this stop was without reasonable suspicion. State v. Bell-Brayboy, 2020 La. App. LEXIS 368 (La. App. 2 Cir. Mar. 4, 2020)*:

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA2: Continuation of stop was without RS

E.D.Tex.: Conclusory objections to R&R are denied

Conclusory objections to the R&R on this search issue are overruled. United States v. Wilson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36571 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2020). Feeling a firearm during a patdown is plain feel. United States v. White, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Conclusory objections to R&R are denied

N.D.Ohio: Controlled buy is PC; CI’s alleged lie isn’t Franks issue

A controlled buy was probable cause. The claim that the CI lied isn’t cognizable under Franks. United States v. Sheridan, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36163 (N.D. Ohio. Mar. 3, 2020). There were disputed questions of fact on whether it was … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Controlled buy is PC; CI’s alleged lie isn’t Franks issue

N.D.Ill.: Shots fired call specifying def’s backyard was exigency permitting entry

A report of gunshots from defendant’s backyard justified exigency entry into yard. “In response to Officer Gali’s statement that they could do it the easy way or get a search warrant, Pouncey responded, ‘go ahead, bro.’ The Court reviewed the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Shots fired call specifying def’s backyard was exigency permitting entry

E.D.La.: Despite apparent validity of motion to suppress never pursued, defense counsel kept evidence out of plea colloquy, so no IAC because of strategy call

Defense counsel didn’t file a motion to suppress evidence because defendant’s stop likely was without reasonable suspicion, and a motion to suppress might well have been granted. However, there was a legitimate strategic reason for not moving to suppress which … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Despite apparent validity of motion to suppress never pursued, defense counsel kept evidence out of plea colloquy, so no IAC because of strategy call

OH5: Driver’s consent to search car doesn’t extend to passenger’s backpack

Driver’s consent to search car did not extend to passenger’s backpack. The state’s reliance on inventory failed for not proving up the policy. State v. Pennington, 2020-Ohio-757, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 688 (5th Dist. Mar. 2, 2020). “After considering the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inventory, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH5: Driver’s consent to search car doesn’t extend to passenger’s backpack

ID: Lack of objection to body cam video showing refusal of consent wasn’t plain error

The police properly seized defendant’s home to preserve evidence of murder on exigent circumstances. There was also a reasonable protective sweep. Defendant didn’t object to the body cam video that had a refusal to consent to the house search, and … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on ID: Lack of objection to body cam video showing refusal of consent wasn’t plain error