Daily Archives: March 26, 2020

CA6: The fact the officer was investigating a misdemeanor that didn’t happen in his presence doesn’t confine the 4A inquiry despite the common law

The Fourth Amendment does not prohibit officers from investigating misdemeanors and making stops based on that, even if the common law prohibits arrests for misdemeanors not committed in the officer’s presence. United States v. Jones, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 9038 … Continue reading

Posted in Common law, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: The fact the officer was investigating a misdemeanor that didn’t happen in his presence doesn’t confine the 4A inquiry despite the common law

CA4: Even if Rule 41 was violated by not leaving application for SW at scene it wasn’t prejudicial or intentional

“Here, the district court credited Agent Hayes’ testimony that he left a copy of the face of the warrant and an inventory of the items seized in the search, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(f)(1)(C), but that he did not … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Even if Rule 41 was violated by not leaving application for SW at scene it wasn’t prejudicial or intentional

DE: Officer’s signing SW affidavit with “Tpr. Santangelo #1826.” showed he was reasonably experienced

Defendant argued that the DUI search warrant lacked probable cause because the officer didn’t specify his training in the affidavit. “The search warrant affidavit is signed ‘Tpr. Santangelo #1826.’ This information allowed the issuing magistrate to reasonably infer that Santangelo … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Officer’s signing SW affidavit with “Tpr. Santangelo #1826.” showed he was reasonably experienced

NM: “Is there anything on your person that I should know about?” is subject to Quarles public safety exception

A question about anything on defendant’s person was subject to Quarles public safety exception. “While Defendant was in custody, but before he was advised of his Miranda rights, an officer asked him, ‘Is there anything on your person that I … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NM: “Is there anything on your person that I should know about?” is subject to Quarles public safety exception

CA7: Running warrants on stopped panhandlers was reasonable

Chicago PD officers stopped panhandlers and ran warrants once they had their IDs. “We conclude that officers may execute a name check on an individual incidental to a proper stop under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 16, 88 S. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: Running warrants on stopped panhandlers was reasonable