S.D.Ga.: There is no per se staleness, and how is DNA stale?

There is no per se staleness. A new warrant for defendant’s DNA alleging it was previously drawn in 2005 and 2007 and matched wasn’t stale. How does DNA change? It doesn’t. United States v. Williams, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38735 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 13, 2020), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38430 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 4, 2020).

CSLI information obtained under a search warrant is reviewed under the same standard of review of any warrant, and, even if there was no probable cause, there is nothing but good faith here. United States v. Johnson, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 7021 (2d Cir. Mar. 6, 2020).

Plaintiff stated a claim that overcame qualified immunity for the police shooting death of her mentally disturbed son who wasn’t posing a sufficient threat to justify it. Crowder v. City of Manila, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 7026 (8th Cir. Mar. 6, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, DNA, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.