Daily Archives: March 28, 2020

EFF: EFF, ACLU & CDT Argue Five Months of Warrantless Covert 24/7 Video Surveillance Violates 4A

EFF: EFF, ACLU & CDT Argue Five Months of Warrantless Covert 24/7 Video Surveillance Violates Fourth Amendment by Jennifer Lynch (“Should the fact that your neighbors can see the outside of your house mean the police can use a camera … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: EFF, ACLU & CDT Argue Five Months of Warrantless Covert 24/7 Video Surveillance Violates 4A

Law.com: Understanding the Privacy Implications of Digital Technology

Law.com: Understanding the Privacy Implications of Digital Technology by Leonard Deutchman (“In this month’s article, we will examine the Superior Court’s reasoning in Dunkins and compare it to the U.S. Supreme Court’s reasoning in Carpenter. As with so many Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Law.com: Understanding the Privacy Implications of Digital Technology

CA11: Failure to join in the codef’s motion to suppress is waiver

Failure to join in the codefendant’s motion to suppress is waiver. United States v. Russa, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 9288 (11th Cir. Mar. 25, 2020). In a 2254 COA: “Assuming that counsel was deficient in failing to raise the plain-view … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA11: Failure to join in the codef’s motion to suppress is waiver

FL2: Without a link to crime, grabbing one’s waistband and pockets not RS

No weapon had been involved in a robbery the police were investigating, and they knew defendant wasn’t the robber. When they approached and he felt his waistband and pockets, they didn’t have reasonable suspicion. Townsend v. State, 2020 Fla. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on FL2: Without a link to crime, grabbing one’s waistband and pockets not RS

M.D.Fla.: Seven week delay for SW for cell phone validly seized wasn’t unreasonable

A delay of seven weeks for seeking a search warrant for a cell phone already validly seized wasn’t unreasonable. Several cases approved long delays, and this is near the outer limit, but still valid. United States v. Butler, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Seven week delay for SW for cell phone validly seized wasn’t unreasonable

VT: Smell of mj and surrender of a small amount in recreational mj state wasn’t PC

There wasn’t probable cause under the state constitution to seize defendant’s vehicle because the tip was too vague and general even if it satisfied the state rules and properly identified the driver, his smoking, and the presence of air fresheners … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on VT: Smell of mj and surrender of a small amount in recreational mj state wasn’t PC

E.D.Mich.: Email SW signed on SignNow app valid

An email search warrant signed by the issuing judge on a tablet with the SignNow app was valid. United States v. Lantzy, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50057 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 24, 2020). “We conclude that the circumstances here were such … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Email SW signed on SignNow app valid

N.D.Ohio: A generic list of the items to be seized is appropriate in drug cases

A generic list of the items to be seized is appropriate in drug cases. United States v. Grant, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50390 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 24, 2020):

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: A generic list of the items to be seized is appropriate in drug cases

CA4: Some damage can be expected in execution of a SW; is it “objectively reasonable” or not?

Some damage can be expected in executing a search warrant. Whether it was so excessive to be objectively unreasonable is the question. Here, there was damage, but it wasn’t unreasonable under the circumstances, and the officers get qualified immunity. Cybernet, … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Some damage can be expected in execution of a SW; is it “objectively reasonable” or not?