Daily Archives: March 1, 2020

techdirt: FBI And DOJ Personnel Confirm Agents Frequently Fudge Facts When Seeking FISA Warrants

techdirt: FBI And DOJ Personnel Confirm Agents Frequently Fudge Facts When Seeking FISA Warrants by Tim Cushing:

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on techdirt: FBI And DOJ Personnel Confirm Agents Frequently Fudge Facts When Seeking FISA Warrants

NE: Inventory wasn’t pretext for investigation; body cam video showed how it was done, and written policy could be testified to

Defendant’s vehicle was lawfully impounded, as it would have been in any event, and then it was inventoried. The state’s failure to put the inventory policy into evidence was not fatal because there was testimony about it. The inventory search … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on NE: Inventory wasn’t pretext for investigation; body cam video showed how it was done, and written policy could be testified to

DE: A few questions unrelated to the purpose of the stop didn’t measurably extend it

Questions asked of defendant that were unrelated to the justification for his traffic stop did not measurably extend the traffic stop. Although an officer’s questions about defendant’s two cell phones, children and the beach were unrelated to defendant’s failure to … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: A few questions unrelated to the purpose of the stop didn’t measurably extend it

OR: Def’s driving to a controlled buy was PC for automobile exception; not a “police-created exigency”

Police had probable cause to stop defendant on his way to a controlled buy. This did not qualify as a “police-created exigency.” State v. Colman-Pinning, 302 Ore. App. 383 (Feb. 26, 2020). Appellant “seeks appellate relief based on a single … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception | Comments Off on OR: Def’s driving to a controlled buy was PC for automobile exception; not a “police-created exigency”

D.C.: PC for SW moots standing dispute

Defendant claimed in post-conviction that his defense counsel was ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress for lack of standing and inability to undermine the showing of probable cause. It’s unclear what defendant told his lawyer about the facts … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Standing | Comments Off on D.C.: PC for SW moots standing dispute

NYTimes: When the Police Stop a Teenager With Special Needs

NYTimes: When the Police Stop a Teenager With Special Needs by  Michele C. Hollow (“People with autism or other special needs may repeat words, avoid eye contact and run from authorities.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYTimes: When the Police Stop a Teenager With Special Needs

CA8: A home security system alarm is an invitation for a protective sweep when police see a broken window

A home security alarm went off signaling a burglary and police responded. Seeing a broken window, they could enter to conduct a protective sweep, and contraband in plain view could be seized. A cell phone was also seized and later … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA8: A home security system alarm is an invitation for a protective sweep when police see a broken window

D.Neb.: Def questioned in his front yard was effectively in custody for Miranda

Defendant questioned in his front yard was effectively in custody and should have been Mirandized. United States v. Leon, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32964 (D. Neb. Feb. 18, 2020):

Posted in Custody | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Def questioned in his front yard was effectively in custody for Miranda

WaPo: My car was in a hit-and-run. Then I learned it recorded the whole thing.

WaPo: My car was in a hit-and-run. Then I learned it recorded the whole thing. by Geoffrey A. Fowler (“The car is becoming a sentry, a chaperone, and a snitch”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: My car was in a hit-and-run. Then I learned it recorded the whole thing.

D.N.M.: A “manpower shortage” for seizure of possible evidence isn’t exigency without PC

Defendant consented to a search of his car and his hotel room, but not to a search of his guitar case in the room. Thinking there might be drugs there, the officer seized the guitar case to preserve the potential … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on D.N.M.: A “manpower shortage” for seizure of possible evidence isn’t exigency without PC